Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts and this money could be better spent elsewhere.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is an irrefutable fact that art is an integral part of any nation’s culture. In the race of globalization and urbanization many countries are spending a huge money on the art. Masses are citing that governments are squandering money on art instead of using for better purpose. I stand on the side of these people, because, although, art is a part of heritage, but it is not only module that resonates the country.
First of all, art reflects the history and evolution of that country, but without basic development, need of spending an enormous amount on it is preposterous. Development means, enriching people under poverty and providing jobs. Governments can invest that money in industries and create jobs as a result the unemployment rate will decrease and increase the GDP of the nation. Even though art increase tourism which will benefit countries, providing jobs prevail over the profit produced by the tourists. In brief, development of basic needs of the people should be prioritize than investing in art
Another point worth noting is, the money which governments has is from people who are paying taxes, instead of spending on art they can improve the standards of living in the country. In terms of good health, education and infrastructure many countries are lagging. As these are basic amenities that a citizen should deserve, they need to spend cretin amount on them. Investing in these modules not only make people to change their lifestyle but also increase the health of the nation. it has been seen in many developed countries spend a big part of their budget on providing social services such as free education and health. Canada for example has spent half of their budget on free services and 2.5 % on arts as the money come from people who are paying taxes, they thought that spending in art is not important than spending on citizens welfare services
As a conclusion, clearly art is not the only way to project the country, improved lifestyle and good basic needs will show the country's health. I strongly agree with the people who think that governments should spend money on other developments instead of arts
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-03 | Ankita7443 | 89 | view |
| 2019-07-31 | preet kaur | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-31 | preet kaur | 67 | view |
| 2019-06-03 | sharmaisha | 61 | view |
| 2019-03-19 | H@rry | 78 | view |
- Nowadays more and more people are spending less time at home Why do you think it happens What effect does this have on individuals and the society 61
- Many sports players advertised in sports products Do you think advantages outweigh the disadvantages 72
- Some people encourage Development of factory farming and the scientific creation of fruits and vegetables in agriculture but others oppose these developments Discuss both views and give your own opinion 74
- Nowadays many people choose ready made food and refuse to cook at home. Why do you think it happens? What are the advantages and disadvantages of such a choice? 61
- Many offenders commit more crimes after serving the first punishment. Why is this happening, and what measures can be taken to tackle this problem? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 160, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'huge money'.
Suggestion: huge money
...rbanization many countries are spending a huge money on the art. Masses are citing that gove...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 568, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'prioritized'?
Suggestion: prioritized
... of basic needs of the people should be prioritize than investing in art Another ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 487, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...also increase the health of the nation. it has been seen in many developed countri...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, for example, in brief, such as, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1802.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 361.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99168975069 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35889894354 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70640421787 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.481994459834 0.561755894193 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 542.7 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 79.8446825614 49.4020404114 162% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.133333333 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0666666667 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.53333333333 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197717956912 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0741206290044 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0747931008418 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140525131969 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0299743873146 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.