Some people think international car-free days are an effective way of reducing air pollution, others think there are some other ways. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Air pollution, a major concern of this modern era, has become a frequent subject of debate. People have different approaches to deal with this problematic issue. While many believe that soma global schemes such as car-free days are practical methods, others argue that there are more effective remedies like promoting the public transportation system.
To begin with, it is undeniable that the amount of exhaust fume that vehicles produce makes a significant contribution to increasing air contamination. To reduce this carbon emission, the days without cars became a popular action. This measure results in a reduction of carbon emission that releases into the atmosphere. The positive effects of this action, albeit small, lead to providing citizens with fresh air. Take Tehran as the most polluted city in Iran, which experiences several warming days during the winter. A day without cars, make a huge impact on the reduction of air contamination.
In contrast, however, there is a commonly held view that states there are many other practical steps that can be taken to tackle this issue. Firstly, a developed and modern public transportation system, including adequate train or bus lines with comfortable seats which provide people with easy access to all points around the city, even remote area, play a vital role in decreasing the air pollution. Secondly, educating people about those negative effects of their carbon footprint on the environment, especially air, can raise public awareness about this subject and might encourage people to use public transportation rather than their private cars. If people be aware of those consequences that are associated with increased usage of fossil fuels, they probably prefer to use public transportation or a renewable source of energy. Finally, set and enforcement of stricter rules with regard to not only the quality of fuel but also the amount of carbon emission that each person can produce is another feasible solution.
In conclusion, based on the above-aforementioned explanation, while many people think the international car-free day is an effective method to combat air pollution, I would argue that there are other practical solutions which is able to make a great contribution to this issue.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-01 | mitul99 | 89 | view |
| 2021-08-23 | phg_phg | 84 | view |
| 2021-06-04 | lischt13 | 78 | view |
| 2020-12-27 | yaldaasgari | 89 | view |
| 2019-06-18 | aakash chokshi | 93 | view |
- Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of society. Others, however, believe that school is the place to learn this. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 73
- Scientists say that in the future humanity will speak the same language.Do you think this is a positive or negative social development? 11
- The charts show the main methods of transport of people travelling to one university in 2004 and2009. 67
- Scientists say that in the future humanity will speak the same language. Do you think this is a positive or negative social development? 67
- Scientists say that in the future humanity will speak the same language. Do you think this is a positive or negative social development? 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, while, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, to begin with, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1911.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 356.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36797752809 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92247574399 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592696629213 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 611.1 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.3245507258 49.4020404114 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.4 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7333333333 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.6 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180826013689 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.059353784369 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0578750745238 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131711702421 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0635267648563 0.056905535591 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.57 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.