Some people think that it is more beneficial to take part in sports which are played in teams, like football. While other people think that taking part in individual sports is better, like tennis or swimming. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
It is said by few that games which are played in team are useful in numerous ways and have huge positive impact, whereas others opine that participating in one to one game is a better option. I assert that both the sports have there own advantages, but if we compare games which are played in team are helpful in teaching many life long skills.
Pitching into the first area of discussion, considering the benefit of individual games. Each and every person has different nature, some are extrovert and some are introvert. People who are not able to express themselves will definitely not able to perform well in group activities, despite of having huge talent. Many individually played games are helpful in enhancing the critical thinking and reasoning ability, which leads to mental growth . For example chess, is a mental game which increases the thinking capability of the young minds. Apart from this, games like swimming helps one to remain fit and active. Physical strength increase by playing games which require body movement. Moreover in this game everyone can perform the task at their own speed, and success and failure completely depends upon personal performance.
On the other side, the predominant benefit of playing group games are development of harmony and leadership quality. Children learn to complete any task by dividing the work and working in a unity, which is the real life skill and useful in later years. For instant, in all the organisation, project and task are allotted in a team and all have to work together as a group. In team sports, one person is elected as leader who has to manage the team. Effective and good leaders are required in all spare of life, they gain the quality of showing the path to others and ultimately lead to growth of the society and nation as a whole. Hence, team games cultivate skill which are useful in later stages of life.
In conclusion, no doubt individual games helps in physical and mental development, but if children are taught in early age to be in group, than it will nurture the talent, by virtue of which country will flourish and develop in a better way.
- In Britain, when someone gets old they often go to live in a home with other old people where there are nurses to look after them. Sometimes the government has to pay for this care.Who do you think should pay for this care, the government or the family? 67
- In Britain, when someone gets old they often go to live in a home with other old people where there are nurses to look after them. Sometimes the government has to pay for this care.Who do you think should pay for this care, the government or the family? 67
- Some people believe that hobbies need to be difficult to be enjoyable.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- In Britain, when someone gets old they often go to live in a home with other old people where there are nurses to look after them. Sometimes the government has to pay for this care.Who do you think should pay for this care, the government or the family? 67
- Some people think that it is more beneficial to take part in sports which are played in teams, like football. While other people think that taking part in individual sports is better, like tennis or swimming. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 228, Rule ID: THERE_OWN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'their own'?
Suggestion: their own
...ion. I assert that both the sports have there own advantages, but if we compare games whi...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 323, Rule ID: MANY_FEW_UNCOUNTABLE[2]
Message: Use 'much' or 'little' with uncountable nouns.
Suggestion: much; little
... played in team are helpful in teaching many life long skills. Pitching into the...
^^^^
Line 3, column 445, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ng ability, which leads to mental growth . For example chess, is a mental game whi...
^^
Line 3, column 690, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...ying games which require body movement. Moreover in this game everyone can perform the t...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, if, moreover, so, well, whereas, apart from, as to, for example, in conclusion, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1771.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 366.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83879781421 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37391431897 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51873718434 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546448087432 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 567.9 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.5067617958 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.176470588 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5294117647 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.29411764706 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135910549115 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0449827589263 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0335537419328 0.0667982634062 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0819940312864 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0428068001074 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.