Some people think that modern technology is making people more sociable, while others think it is making them less sociable, discuss both views and give opinion
In this contemporary era, everyone has their own profile on social media platforms which enable them to become more social. The conundrum is, whether it makes people more sociable or it actually lessens their rudimentary social skills. I discussed both the views in this essay.
There is no doubt that advent of laptop, mobiles and internet has made huge impact on one's socializing skills. As internet has become almost free and ubiquitous, people often use mobiles and laptop devices to communicate with each other. these platforms provide comprehensive set of tools to make and maintain better relationship with each other no matter where they are. For instance, Facebook facilitates people to chat and even make a video conference call. Additionally, this platform also remembers special dates and occasions like birthday and anniversary so that people can greet each other. However, certain orthodox people believe that these platforms certainly reduce one natural skill of socializing.
Continuous use of these platforms and devises make peoples less social in long haul. Many of the teenagers do know how to wish birthdays on social media but do not know hot to greet elders when they meet on particular occasions like marriages and communities' get to gathers. Furthermore, people are so much addicted to or influenced by these platforms that they almost forgot to express respect to elders on occasion like new years and religious events. For instance, today's teenagers do not know how to welcome their guests at home as well as they are not confident while confronting their guest, specifically elders. The aforementioned arguments clarify that modern technologies actually make future generation paralyzed in term of socialization.
To conclude, modern technical advancements could help people to enhance their intrapersonal and interpersonal skills which can be considered as a social skill. I firmly believe that those are the better platforms in today's busy life to greet and remember someone on their special life events.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-22 | niks23 | 89 | view |
| 2018-12-08 | gspreet1010@gmail.com | 89 | view |
| 2018-10-19 | gspreet1010@gmail.com | 89 | view |
- Some people think history has nothing or little to tell us, but other think studying the past history can help us better understand the present. Please discuss the two views and give your opinion. 73
- It is thought by many that children has to do homework in their free time. Do you agree or Disagree. 73
- Some people are concerned that children spend too much time on computers - playing games, chatting and watching videos. But all this time is actually good preparation for children, who will have to spend many hours working on computers throughout their ed 89
- Some people prefer cold weather conditions while other don’t discuss both the view and give your opinion. 73
- Some people consider price as most important thing to think about when buying product (such as cell phone) or service (e.g medical treatment). Do you agree or disagree? 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 239, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: These
...devices to communicate with each other. these platforms provide comprehensive set of ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 750, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ion paralyzed in term of socialization. To conclude, modern technical advancemen...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, furthermore, however, if, so, well, while, for instance, no doubt, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1730.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40625 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83769272473 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596875 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 543.6 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.8294571547 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.125 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.125 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198543832974 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0733095375331 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0545484702836 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116920788421 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0440325895659 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.