Some people think that one should plan detailed activities for their leisure time others disagree with that Discuss both views and give your own opinion

Essay topics:

Some people think that one should plan detailed activities for their leisure time, others disagree with that. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

A portion of the population like better scheduling and make a list of things to do in detail for their time off, while others are in disaccord with them. I reckon the best strategy to take advantage over a period off from obligations, or daily routines is to craft detailed planning of it to optimize that time. this is essay will discuss this issue using examples to support arguments and demonstrate points.

Indeed, many people enjoy holidays or periods off without planning, because craft activities plan could give stress to this chill out time, in fact, a survey made by IDEAM institute, evidence that the majority of the Colombian population tend to do not program during holidays, just to avoid stress to follow schedules. Hence, this is the way that a plethora of people chose to spend their chill out period.

Opposite to this, exist folks that really prefer design what to do on holidays or weekends to employ their free time as better as possible, due to build a list and set times for activities, helps to do myriad more of activities without wasting of time, to demonstrate this, there are some studies done by the University of Cambridge that demonstrate how effective the planning is over saving time and reach goals, which displays the efficiency of this strategic tool. Consequently, this substantiates the theory that planning aid to maximize any time, in this specific case periods off.

To sum up, therefore free time is to rest and do not get stress, I do not believe this is the best way to maximize this kind of periods due to we are going to lost more time looking for what to do. Nowadays exist various apps planners to aid this or any kind of schedule.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (4 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-03-24 davidlvg1108 78 view
Essays by user davidlvg1108 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 314, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...d planning of it to optimize that time. this is essay will discuss this issue using ...
^^^^
Line 1, column 412, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...pport arguments and demonstrate points. Indeed, many people enjoy holidays or pe...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 166, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hill out time, in fact, a survey made by IDEAM institute, evidence that the major...
^^
Line 7, column 128, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...nds to employ their free time as better as possible, due to build a list and set t...
^^
Line 9, column 160, Rule ID: GOING_TO_VBD[1]
Message: 'Going to' requires the base form: 'lose'
Suggestion: lose
... kind of periods due to we are going to lost more time looking for what to do. Nowad...
^^^^
Line 9, column 208, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'exists'.
Suggestion: exists
...e time looking for what to do. Nowadays exist various apps planners to aid this or an...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, hence, if, look, really, so, therefore, while, i reckon, in fact, kind of, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1404.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.7593220339 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5416405725 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.562711864407 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 439.2 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 20.2975951904 158% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 122.056554388 49.4020404114 247% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 156.0 106.682146367 146% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.7777777778 20.7667163134 158% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8888888889 7.06120827912 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1685965009 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0750469759998 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0475617334805 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110211808789 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0435366612128 0.056905535591 77% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.0946893788 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.46 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.92 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.1190380762 146% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.