Some people think that parents should teach their children how to be good members of society. Others, however, believe that school is the best place to learn this.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Some would argue that mothers and fathers are responsible to educate their young ones about the qualities to become a useful person of society, while others say that teachers are the best to teach this to students. Although school teachers are qualified professionals who can train pupils with the best approach, I believe children are more closer to their family members and learning from them would be more effective.
On the one hand, the teachers are professionally trained to teach students in the best way to make the learning process efficient. This is to say that schools only how Travers that have cleared required education and can demonstrate the right talent to teach students. A teacher can easily evaluate a child's learning capacity and can adapt a method that will still the best. For example, a recent study showed that 87% of the parents want their children to get education from a well qualified teacher only. Despite this, I believe children are mentally attached with their mother and father that can lead to a better learning environment.
On the other hand, parents have a strong bond with their children that could make learning process more productive. This is because children are influenced by their parents. If parents follow the traits of a good citizen, youngsters would copy the same. This would results in a natural process of learning between both the generations. For example, a recent study by Oxford University revealed that 93% of adolescents follow same eating habits as their parents. Therefore, I believe family members are the best to teach good characteristics to the young ones.
To conclude, while schools have professional staff to educate pupils about how to become a responsible citizen, I believe the parents are more connected the children and the learning curve between then would be more pragmatic.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-07-18 | bhatvishal@ | 78 | view |
2019-07-18 | bhatvishal@ | 56 | view |
2019-07-15 | Abdelfatah | 78 | view |
2019-06-28 | Randa Agha | 73 | view |
2019-04-27 | buffalo | 11 | view |
- Some people think that people should choose their job based on income in order to provide security for their family Do you think money is an important factor when choosing a job what other factors should be considered 56
- Some employers reward members of staff for their exceptional contribution to the company by giving them extra money. This practice can act as an incentive for some but may also have a negative impact on others. To what extent is this style of management e 84
- In many countries, as people are earning more these days, they are also spending money in buying more and more items. Do you think it is a positive or negative development? 61
- Last month you had a holiday overseas where you stayed with some friends. They have just sent you some photos of your holiday. Write a letter to your friend. In your letter• thank them for the photos and for the holiday• explain why you didn’t write 73
- Some people say that industrial growth is necessary to solve poverty but some other people argue that industrial growth is creating environmental problems and it should be stopped Discuss both views and give your opinion 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 337, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'closer' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: closer
...e best approach, I believe children are more closer to their family members and learning fr...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 266, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'result'
Suggestion: result
...ngsters would copy the same. This would results in a natural process of learning betwee...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, still, then, therefore, well, while, for example, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1554.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11184210526 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65097294375 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.483552631579 0.561755894193 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 471.6 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.3411696295 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.0 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7142857143 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.35714285714 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294950966199 0.244688304435 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109958831093 0.084324248473 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0432476722705 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191170785236 0.151304729494 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0304462494909 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.