Some people think people are responsible for a solution to pollution made by transportation and other think government are . Discuss both views and give your own opinion
At this moment in time, society thinks that they should come up with a plan how to lessen the pollution of vehicles. Although, some of the of the populace thinks that the authority should do something to suppress the problem.
To start with, modern transportation system burdens the public in terms of Noise and Environmental contamination. At this point the citizens have created a plan to slowly minimize the negative effects of automobiles. For example, Tesla Incorporated a car manufacturer have created an electric power vehicle which do not emit toxic carbon monoxide to the surroundings. This invention is one of the best solution that they have come up with which in time could help the people to gradually solve the pollution cause by vehicle emission in a pragmatic way.
However, the conservatives think that the regime should do the resolution on how we could deliberately decrease the environmental contamination we are facing today. The government encouraging the masses to use electric powered public transportation system instead of using their private vehicles. This would greatly affect the adverse result of the by products of the car. Moreover, the administration are also giving the public information on how they could help slowly curb the impending contamination of their homeland.
In conclusion, I agree that the government should do the necessary action to decrease the pollution that we are experiencing right now. As well as the populace should also follow what the regime are encouraging us to do and in time we could witness fewer negative impurities in our environment.
- You live in a room in college which you share with another student. However, there are many problems with this arrangements and you find it very difficult to work. Describe the situation, explain your problems why it is difficult to work and say what kind 73
- More and more people are choosing ready to eat food rather cooking themselves Do this development has more advantages over disadvantages 71
- Write a letter to a friend inviting on family function. What is the occasion, what are your plans and why is it important that she should come. 11
- Your friend has moved to another country. He or she is coming back to your country for a visit. You have arranged a party for him/her 73
- Some people do not believe in the benefits of good diet and daily exercise. To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 118, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ow to lessen the pollution of vehicles. Although, some of the of the populace thinks tha...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 128, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...en the pollution of vehicles. Although, some of the of the populace thinks that the authori...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 133, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'of the'.
Suggestion: of the
...e pollution of vehicles. Although, some of the of the populace thinks that the authority shou...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 535, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a pragmatic way" with adverb for "pragmatic"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...the pollution cause by vehicle emission in a pragmatic way. However, the conservatives think th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, moreover, so, well, for example, in conclusion, as well as, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1352.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24031007752 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07799773683 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 176.041082164 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.538759689922 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 430.2 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.5432827485 49.4020404114 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 112.666666667 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127552625678 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0447661345971 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0360008418033 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.076703394138 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0331778095798 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.