Some people think that a person improves their intellectual skill more when doing group activities. To what extent do you agree?
It is commonly believed that a group-level task develop better intellect in an individual. In my opinion, I completely concur with this thought-process and belief, as activities performed in partnership is beneficial in many ways than in a solo. In this essay, I shall discuss the two primary merits of group concept: firstly, it hones participant’s interpersonal skill; secondly, team member learn from each other in different ways.
To begin with, learning in group improves soft skills of a person and mental abilities. This is because, group task develop deeper understanding of teamwork, empathy and make them more considerate towards other group members. Furthermore, competitive environment and brain storming increase mental power to handle difficult situations. This is exemplified by the many sports games: like Cricket, Football and Soccer. Hence, it grooms people in many ways as team games cultivate healthy competency due to competition.
On the other hand, while working and playing in group, people can learn from each other mistakes and accomplishments, and help each other to progress. This is because, when many people collaborate, they discuss numerous ideas and share their diverse opinion as per their experiences. This way, one can analyze their level on intellect and work towards their weaknesses and strengths. For instance, schools and colleges often give their students group projects for advance learning, and similarly, professionals work in team to increase the productivity. Therefore, joint effort not only helps in knowing ones’ capability but also to raise the efficiency.
In conclusion, I strongly believe with the notion because team activities have numerous advantages for the participants and their intellectuals. Moreover, it is significant that performing in a group sharpens mental abilities, and gives consciousness of one’s capabilities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-19 | kongkona | 67 | view |
| 2019-10-19 | Navkiran kaur | 67 | view |
| 2019-10-03 | CANADA | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-23 | Mohammad Rezaur Rahman | 67 | view |
| 2019-07-17 | Sonali Guha | 67 | view |
- However, there is no denial that socialization is not appreciated by company, but such abilities are highly subjective and it also depends on person to person. 78
- “Prevention is better than cure”. Researching and treating diseases is too costly so it would be better to invest in preventative measures. To what extent do you agree? 78
- Today more and more tourists are visiting places where conditions are difficult, such as Sahara desert or the Antarctica.What are the benefits and disadvantage for tourists who visit such places? 89
- Children brought up in families with less money are better prepared for life than those from wealthy families To what extent do you agree or disagree Give reasons and include example 92
- Some people think women should be given equal chances to work and excel in their careers Others believe that a woman s role should be limited to taking care of the house and children Which opinion do you agree 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 440, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...earn from each other in different ways. To begin with, learning in group improve...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, if, moreover, second, secondly, similarly, so, therefore, while, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1625.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.72183098592 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21667408424 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.62676056338 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 486.9 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 5.43587174349 221% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.8426687882 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.333333333 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9333333333 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.5333333333 7.06120827912 177% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14211599497 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.047776815339 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0454997432761 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0824324007788 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0357924262384 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.9 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.81 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.