Some people think public libraries are necessary others believe that the public libraries are useless What is your opinion and provide with some relevant examples

Essay topics:

Some people think public libraries are necessary, others believe that the public libraries are useless. What is your opinion and provide with some relevant examples.

As technology keeps developing, some people declare that public libraries are no longer useful, while others insist that they are still necessary. In my opinion, public libraries are important and should not be removed.

On the one hand, electronic books are becoming popular because of the development of computers, cell phones and tablets. People can read e-books much more convenient to a portable device, instead of reading an actual book. In addition, people can search all types of books through the Internet without spending a long time looking for books in a library. The internet and portable device are such convenient and efficient tools for reading that it is understandable for someone to claim that public libraries are not required any more.

On the other hand, a public library not only provides abundant books for the general public, but also offers them a quiet and comfortable place to read. Someone may find it difficult to concentrate on reading at home due to all kinds of distractions, such as noises generated by family members, TV programs and video game playing. However, they would not face such an issue reading in a library. Additionally, large amounts of public libraries are equipped with modern tools, such as the Internet, computers and even portable device, hence people can get access to sufficient reading resources in a public library. Furthermore, some public libraries are so historical and stylish that they can even serve as tourist attractions to visitors from the globe, so that they can boost the development of local travelling industry and make contributions to economic growth.

To conclude, regardless of the development of portable e-books, public libraries are significant to the local area and they should be maintained well.

Votes
Average: 8.1 (3 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-10-08 sahilshell 78 view
2020-05-31 wjl881219 81 view
2020-05-09 akelat 47 view
Essays by user wjl881219 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 78, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...ot only provides abundant books for the general public, but also offers them a quiet and comfo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, however, if, look, may, so, still, well, while, as to, in addition, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1500.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24475524476 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79374786634 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.566433566434 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 469.8 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.8328075684 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.0 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8333333333 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.6666666667 7.06120827912 165% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264864454231 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105535131929 0.084324248473 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0916942338476 0.0667982634062 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18368067379 0.151304729494 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100185207498 0.056905535591 176% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.