Some people think that schools should select students according to their academic abilities, while others believe that it is better to have students with different abilities studying together. Discuss both views and state your own opinion
Some people believe that sorting students who have the same academics abilities is more beneficial for the children for their development. Others take the opposite view and say that all students should be educated together regardless of their abilities. Although allowing students with various learning abilities to participate in the same class have a great benefits of students’ development and opportunities to study, I prefer categorising students according to their academic performance owing to their advantages of studying speed and environment.
First, mixed abilities classes provide a suitable environment for children’s all-around development. These classes offer students opportunities to learn from each other so that they can develop the abilities that were absent from them. For example, a student who is good at math but week at art can help the students who are weak at math but gifted with art and vice versa. Moreover, it’s not difficult to realize that nowadays, some specialized schools are too focused on the student's achievements and scores and that they will prioritize the choice of students with good learning ability instead of those who good at art or have some talent that is not related to academic. As a result, those student won’t have the chance to study equally as others and allowing students with various learning abilities to participate in the same class will be a good way to solve this problem. However, studying in a mixed ability class also means that students will have more things to do. The more subjects they have, the more pressure they are under.
On the other hand, grouping pupils according to their academic ability can help teachers to work at the right speed to their students and to have a suitable lesson plans according to the student’s need and understanding. As to students, they would find it motivated to study favorite subjects, which brings efficiency in education and develop their actual talent. Moreover, selecting on their academic ability is clearly fairer. For example, why should a student, who has behaved badly the entire year, and got lower grades, be placed in a class with hard working dedicated students, which is absolutely unfair ? By sorting students according to academics performance , high-level groups may progress faster and lower level groups can benefit from a slower pace. Consequently, it can reduce a sense of insecurity from students who hardly catch up with their classmates and preserve students ‘self-esteem and confident at schooling environment. However, this method will probably increase the risk of biased, subjective schooling and not evenly developed brain students. Consequently, school-leavers will suffer some tremendous issues when they confront challenging real life circumstances.
In conclusion, it seem to me that students should study together but also have some classes focus on their major. With week students, schools should have some extra coaching for them so that students can develop comprehensively and yet maintain the effectiveness.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 383, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ifted with art and vice versa. Moreover, it’s not difficult to realize that nowad...
^^
Line 2, column 690, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this student' or 'those students'?
Suggestion: this student; those students
...s not related to academic. As a result, those student won’t have the chance to study equally ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 735, Rule ID: EQUALLY_AS[1]
Message: Don't say 'equally as'. You can use either 'equally' or 'as' on its own. When comparing two nouns, use 'just as'.
Suggestion: equally; as; just as
... student won’t have the chance to study equally as others and allowing students with vario...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 667, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...dents according to academics performance , high-level groups may progress faster a...
^^
Line 4, column 19, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'seems'?
Suggestion: seems
... life circumstances. In conclusion, it seem to me that students should study togeth...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, if, may, moreover, so, as to, for example, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 7.85571142285 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 21.0 10.4138276553 202% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 19.0 7.30460921844 260% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 39.0 24.0651302605 162% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2587.0 1615.20841683 160% => OK
No of words: 479.0 315.596192385 152% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40083507307 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67825486995 4.20363070211 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90209478184 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 236.0 176.041082164 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.492693110647 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 786.6 506.74238477 155% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.9573881581 49.4020404114 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.35 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.95 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.45 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.406034080705 0.244688304435 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143116991252 0.084324248473 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0826984700114 0.0667982634062 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.297126355789 0.151304729494 196% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0611910968998 0.056905535591 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 78.4519038076 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.