Some people think that strict punishments for driving offences are the key to reducing traffic accidents. Others, however, believe that other measures would be more effective in improving road safety. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
While many advocates that traffic incidents could be suppressed by tough punishments, others believe there are other solutions to tackle the problem. In my opinion, strict laws are not truly effective to prevent mounting careless drivers, instead, upgrading public transports should be done to ensure the safety on the streets.
On the one hand, although various traffic laws were adopted to prevent accidents, annual casualties are still on the rise. This was because the traffic prohibitions are too many for drivers to fully memorize. This fact proves more and tougher punishments unsuccessfully to decrease the number of traffic accidents. In addition to that, there are sometimes a few law cracks that irresponsible drivers can take advantage to avoid the punishment. For example, if the amount of alcohol in the body is too little to be detected by the police, people may ignore the rules and drinking alcohol while driving. As a result, laws and punishments lost their effectiveness in protecting people on roads.
On the other hand, improving public transport would be more helpful to resolve the problem. If bus numbers are enhanced, commuters are no longer to wait too long to take buses. As a result, they will opt to use public transportation because of its convenience, leading to a drastically downward trend in private vehicles on roads. Fewer private cars or bicycles will be followed by fewer traffic incidents. Thanks for that, we can easily achieve the goals of upgrading road safety without causing escalating frustration to citizens as traffic laws may cause.
In conclusion, reinforcing public transportation quality to encourage people to use would be the most efficient approach for limiting casualties by traffic through significantly decreasing the number of private vehicles in use.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-17 | mahyarr | 73 | view |
| 2021-03-12 | Harmanpreet 0000 | 73 | view |
| 2020-12-29 | Hanachan123456789 | 78 | view |
| 2020-07-19 | nmily89 | 73 | view |
| 2020-03-04 | chander.k | 73 | view |
- Nations should spend more money on skills and vocational training for practical work rather than on university education To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Nowadays many people cannot read or write What problems does this cause What measures can governments take to solve these problems 67
- For school children their teachers have more influence on their intelligence and social development than their parents To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people claim that museums and art galleries are not needed today because everyone can see historical objects or art works by computer Do you agree or disagree 73
- More and more people want to buy famous brands of clothes cars and other items What are the reasons Do you think it is a positive or negative development 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 358, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun law seems to be countable; consider using: 'few laws'.
Suggestion: few laws
...addition to that, there are sometimes a few law cracks that irresponsible drivers can t...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 383, Rule ID: FEWER_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'less traffic'?
Suggestion: less traffic
...te cars or bicycles will be followed by fewer traffic incidents. Thanks for that, we can easi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, so, still, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1526.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31707317073 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92163966659 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.581881533101 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 474.3 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.9922854917 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.0 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.07142857143 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220795687209 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0729027752925 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0563049043208 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13422273948 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0390994061028 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.