The tradition that the family gets together to eat meals is disappearing. What are the reasons? What are the impacts?
It is true that more and more people spend less time on gathering with their family at meals. The essay will explain the reasons for the trend and its negatives surround.
The missing out of together meals in households could attribute to two reasons. First, people have to work so hard to make their living and fit the hard-working culture of many businesses. For example, it is common in Japan as workers may have to work up to eighty hours a week to prove their outstanding work ethic; otherwise, they would be fired or verbally warned by the managers. As a result, people hardly spend time eating with their family due to the overwhelming of work. Second, when people have become workaholic, they prefer to live alone in an apartment so that they can continue to work at home without affecting others’ schedules. Eating with family members seems possible if they live independently.
This tendency has negative impacts on people’ health and their relationships with other family members. When individuals spend most of the time at workplace, probably they will offer to eat out to save their limited time budget. Meanwhile, food outside often contain highly amount of fat and unknowingly additional seasonings, which cause bad effects for the bodies. Moreover, less time for home-cooked meals with family may break the strong bonds between family members. Without an hour sitting together to eat, parents and children lose their chance to share their stories and get to understand each other. This deters people from building balanced life with long-lasting relationships.
In conclusion, nowadays people spend less time to eat with their family mostly because of their harshly attach to work. This new lifestyle encourages them to eat more unhealthy street food and live far away from the family. As a consequence, their health and relationships go down.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-12-13 | Hanachan123456789 | 78 | view |
- Nowadays it is not only large companies that can be able to make films Digital technology enables anyone to produce films Do you think this is a positive or negative development 78
- Nowadays many people cannot read or write What problems does this cause What measures can governments take to solve these problems 67
- The world of work is changing rapidly and people cannot depend on the same job or the same conditions of work for life Discuss the possible causes for these changes and give your suggestions on how people should prepare for work in the future 89
- Some people argue that job satisfaction is more important than job security while others believe that they cannot always expect job satisfaction and a permanent job is more important Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 56
- Nations should spend more money on skills and vocational training for practical work rather than on university education To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 282, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...their health and relationships go down.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, moreover, second, so, while, for example, in conclusion, as a result, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 13.1623246493 23% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1565.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11437908497 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65620344102 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591503267974 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 468.9 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.325633788 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.0588235294 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.94117647059 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126750095157 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0485370836845 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0428594261722 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0817422909399 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0271129918755 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.