Some scientists think that computers will soon become more intelligent than humans. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
In the modern world, technology devices are extremely famous such as computers, laptops, mobile phones. Those items can make your life more comfortable and easier. That’s why some scientist experts might think that computers will become more talented than human beings in the near future. From my perspective, I agree that sooner or later, computers can replace humans because they are faster and accurate.
Computer devices play the main role in business and science fields. Their functions are rapid compared to humans. People can use computers for many different purposes such as Microsoft Offices, Word, Excel, Powerpoint, in order to make jobs easier and faster to
complete the tasks. It’s not only for jobs, but computers also support students to study online as well as they can use computers to do their assignments and dissertation quicker. For example, most school programs have online courses or classes so that without computers or laptops, they might have to spend more time going to the campus every class that they attend. Therefore, computers are a fundamental tool that people could use both at work and school to save plenty of their time.
In addition, computers are more accurate than humans. As we know that, the higher technology is, the more functions in computers we can utilize. While computers are not perfect, they might make fewer mistakes than a human. However, computers have auto-correction that can help people to notice right away. For instance, students could use Microsoft Office word for their essays, and the computers can adjust their mistakes by seeing the red underline under the words or sentences that they write. This includes grammar errors and article mistakes. So, people would increase the chance to write an essay more accurate than before.
To conclude, according to some scientists, they tend to think that in the future computers will be more useful than humans. In my opinion, I believe that computers have more special functions than humans because they are more rapid and more accurate.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-29 | faithywealth | 73 | view |
| 2021-10-20 | amanvir2255@gmail.com | 61 | view |
| 2021-10-20 | amanvir2255@gmail.com | 79 | view |
- recommendation to join a gym to friend 73
- smoking is dangerous for health 61
- Experts say older people were happier and healthier in the past because they did more exercise and spent more time with family and friends whereas many now suffer from loneliness and health problems What are the causes of this and what are some solutions 78
- ee 11
- smoking is dangerous 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 144, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...to humans. People can use computers for many different purposes such as Microsoft Offices, Wor...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Complete
...er to make jobs easier and faster to complete the tasks. It’s not only for jobs, but ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, therefore, well, while, for example, for instance, in addition, such as, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1726.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 332.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19879518072 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47546386034 2.80592935109 88% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55421686747 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 534.6 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.6108442402 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.8421052632 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4736842105 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.63157894737 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240440445916 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0850812083603 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0837306211445 0.0667982634062 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151661759373 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.085447757356 0.056905535591 150% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.