Some teachers say students should be organized into groups to study. Others argue students should be made to study alone. Tell the benefits of each study method. Which one do you think is more effective?

Essay topics:

Some teachers say students should be organized into groups to study. Others argue students should be made to study alone. Tell the benefits of each study method. Which one do you think is more effective?

It is believed by some tutors that learners must learn in clusters. Whereas, remaining does not support this trend and think that alone learning should be carried out to have impressive results. In this essay, both the ways will be discussed in the following paragraphs in detail followed by the opinion.
Firstly, Study in the groups has its own benefits such as the discussion forum is the major profit to all the participating members of the group, the clarity on thoughts and knowledge can be made while discussing in sets. Furthermore, the group study is the best way to share knowledge by expressing your thoughts on the subject and learn from your mates. In addition to comparison is also one more benefit while studying with the team.
On the other hand, an unaccompanied study has its own profits. For an illustration, the targets can be marked with owns priority with an independent schedule. A person does not require to cope with other individuals. For example, some are quick in catching things and some are not, in an alone study, a person does not need to wait for other understanding of the subject. Moreover, in this pattern, the scholar should be self-motivational.
Both the ways carry their own advantages. On an overall, the group study has more upside while considering the whole set of a population as lone education has its own limitations. Hence, in my opinion, group study is far better than alone learning.
In conclusion, a study in groups or alone, both carry different style and benefits for the pupil. Although it depends on the student also in which way he understand the topics well. Whilst, the lone study has its limitations like a person should inspire himself and has to complete all the task single-handedly.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-01-16 bhatvishal@ 61 view
2019-01-16 bhatvishal@ 61 view
2018-11-19 S37 73 view
2018-11-19 S37 73 view
Essays by user bhatvishal@ :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 186, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'coping'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'require' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: coping
...ent schedule. A person does not require to cope with other individuals. For example, so...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 98, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...erent style and benefits for the pupil. Although it depends on the student also in which...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 154, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'understands'.
Suggestion: understands
...nds on the student also in which way he understand the topics well. Whilst, the lone study...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, if, moreover, so, well, whereas, while, as to, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1456.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90235690236 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84497240279 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.545454545455 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 443.7 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 10.0 2.52805611222 396% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.5702511125 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.6470588235 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4705882353 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0588235294 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283803169165 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0837542763336 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0430363686384 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146364770022 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0368557368351 0.056905535591 65% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.84 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.