Some young people are leaving the countryside to live in cities and towns, leaving only old people in the countryside. What are the problems caused by this issue? What can be done to solve this issue?
Lately few of the younger generations are migrating to urban areas, and leaving the old age people in countryside. In this essay we shall discuss how this can effect development in rural areas and look at few possible approaches governments can take to resolve them.
On the one hand, as young people move to live in cities the town’s development reduces. Firstly, in terms of infrastructure if taken the example of construction, all these jobs require some physical strength which the older generation lack. Therefore, there are only few of the younger population present in rural areas to work in construction or production sites, because of this it makes infrastructure development impossible. For example, in India the ministry of rural development conducted a survey in few states like Andhra Pradesh and Telanagana and found that more than 12 % of the towns lack the basic amenities like schools and hospitals and community centers. The survey reported that only 3 percent of the population was younger age population rest of 97 % being older generations. It quoted ‘there were jobs in construction, production but no graduates to take those jobs”.
The reason most of the fresh graduates opt to live in cities because of better income and carrier opportunities. As this happens, there are only few young energetic prospects and more of old age individuals left in village side. In my perspective, one viable solution to tackle this problem is by intervention of government. Governments by conducting recruitment drives in targeted rural areas where development is lacking. Hire young graduates and pay them more than what huge corporations pay. Offer them free healthcare and pension plans. By doing so, it would motivate students to stay back rural work towards the betterment of their villages. For example, government of Telanagana has conducted a recruitment drive in two rural towns in Karimnagar and employed more than 500 fresh college graduates paying them higher salaries and free healthcare for working in rural areas.
In conclusion, most of the migration of fresh graduates to cities is for their personal comfort like more income and more benefits. This causes to leave most of village side left with old age. Governments by giving added benefits to work in rural would endeavor many students to work and develop the fading rural towns.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-11 | andytippu2020 | 73 | view |
- Some people prefer to get advice from doctors while others prefer internet for medical recommendations.Discuss both views and give your opinion. 73
- In some developing countries, it is difficult to get good teachers to work in rural areas which can have a negative impact on the education of children in those rural communities.Why do you think good teachers do not want to work in rural areas in develop 78
- Some young people are leaving the countryside to live in cities and towns, leaving only old people in the countryside. What are the problems caused by this issue? What can be done to solve this issue? 73
- Some people view giving presents as an important way to show care to family and friends. Others think there are more important things that can be done to show care and appreciation.Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 145, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'leaving'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'cause' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: leaving
...e income and more benefits. This causes to leave most of village side left with old age....
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, look, so, therefore, as to, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.3376753507 264% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1999.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 382.0 315.596192385 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23298429319 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42095241839 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93239689531 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539267015707 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 621.9 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.0168946526 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.210526316 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1052631579 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.15789473684 7.06120827912 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188837865516 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0607150547748 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0628529568052 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124122042329 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.043553564346 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.