In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still hungry. why is this the case? what can be done about this problem?
Although many developments have taken place in the farming industry worldwide, substantial portion of the population is not able to fulfil their basic necessity of food. This is mainly because of unprecedented increase in world population and lack of availability of modern methods of agriculture. This problem can be overcome by following few steps at national and individual level.
One of the major reason that can be attributed to countless people remaining hungry is the population explosion in the world. This, as a result, causes an enormous strain on the country’s resources and capacity to ensure food to each and every citizen. Moreover, the advancements that have taken place in agriculture are restricted to more developed nations. Whereas, in developing countries such as India, which is majorly an agricultural country, is still using outdated and conventional means of irrigation and production of food grains, consequently reducing the quantity and quality of food grains reaching the people.
In order to deal with this issue, both government and individuals have to play an active role. Allocating government funding towards farming and providing interest free loans to farmers can go a long way in encouraging them to use latest equipment, fertilisers, and scientific manure for achieving large scale production. At individual level, people have to become responsible and avoid food wastages at the first place. For instance, many helplines have been initiated that collect left over food items from parties and distribute it among the impoverished people. Moreover, waste food ought to be collected to make compost which can further be used to nourish crops in the form of manure and avoid soil erosion.
To summarize, the problem of food shortages could be easily tackled if nations and its citizens take joint efforts in working towards this issue by efficiently utilising left over food and also by increasing the production of food grains, by employing cutting-edge technology in growing crops.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-17 | ishween kaur | 89 | view |
- MUSEUMS AND ART GALLERIES SHOULD CONCENTRATE ON WORKS THAT SHOW HISTORY AND CULTURE OF THEIR OWN COUNTRY RATHER THAN WORKS OF THE OTHER PARTS IN THE WORLD TO WHAT EXTENT DO YOU AGREE OR DISAGREE 78
- Some people think that you can only learn about the cultures of different places by traveling there Other people think that you can learn just as much about these places from reading books and watching travel documentaries about them Discuss both these vi 84
- You have seen an advertisement in an Australian magazine for someone to live with a family for six months and look after their six year old child Write a letter to the parents In your letter Explain why you would like the job Give details of why you would 78
- Television is dangerous because it destroys family life and any sense of community instead of visiting people or talking with our family we just watch television To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 78
- MUSEUMS AND ART GALLERIES SHOULD CONCENTRATE ON WORKS THAT SHOW HISTORY AND CULTURE OF THEIR OWN COUNTRY RATHER THAN WORKS OF THE OTHER PARTS IN THE WORLD TO WHAT EXTENT DO YOU AGREE OR DISAGREE 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ty of food grains reaching the people. In order to deal with this issue, both g...
^^^
Line 5, column 228, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'use the latest'.
Suggestion: use the latest
...an go a long way in encouraging them to use latest equipment, fertilisers, and scientific ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, moreover, so, still, whereas, for instance, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1713.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40378548896 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94510878821 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.624605678233 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 537.3 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.9244191287 49.4020404114 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.769230769 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3846153846 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.69230769231 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198140495377 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.073718532502 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0515707781576 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123188512517 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0421773723974 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.11 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.