Studies show that many criminals have a low level of education. For this reason, people believe that the best way to reduce crime is to educate people in prison so they can get a job when they leave prison. Do you agree or disagree?
Unemployment and poverty are indisputably the significant reasons for crimes. Providing vocational education to prisoners inside the penitentiaries would alleviate joblessness and destitution. However, I disagree with the given statement that providing education to inmates is the best way to reduce crime. It is a suitable method, but there are other better methods to curb crime.
First of all, the primary purpose of prisons is not just to punish criminals, but also to rehabilitate them. If this rehabilitation part is not looked into, then the majority of criminals would re-offend after coming out of prison. This is because the general public does not accept such criminals, and nobody likes to give them a job. Therefore just educating them is not enough to reduce crime. The government must ensure that they are given jobs to fend for their basic needs.
Another important fact, which has to be considered is that these penitentiaries are very costly to maintain. When these inmates are taught vocational skills such as carpentry, a lot of infrastructures is required. While all this expenditure may help a few prisoners, it may be futile in case of those hard-core criminals who are not in there because of illiteracy and unemployment. They have a criminal bent of mind. They would never become useful members of society even after such education. Rigorous imprisonment would be better to deter potential criminals.
The best way to reduce crime would be never to let it happen in the first place. Laws should be enforced that people should think a hundred times before resorting to crime. Compulsory primary education should be given to all children. Youth unemployment should be dealt with by creating job openings or by encouraging entrepreneurship.
To recapitulate, educating the prisoners and trying to make them self-sufficient would be good to reduce crime, the better methods would be to stop crime from happening in the first place.
- lt is generally believed that education is of vital importance to the development of individuals and the wellbeing of societies what should education consist of to fulfil both these functions 56
- some people say that it s better to teach language students in small classes whereas others think the number of people does not matter Discuss both sides and give your own opinion 67
- Nowadays in many countries household waste e g food packaging is increasing day by day What are the causes for that How can this problem be solved 84
- Distance learning programs cannot bring the benefit as of attending college or university Agree or disagree 56
- An Australian company offers money to foreign students to study in Australia Write a letter to the company Introduce yourself Say what do you want to study How the money will help you 96
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 252, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...ming out of prison. This is because the general public does not accept such criminals, and nob...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 336, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...s, and nobody likes to give them a job. Therefore just educating them is not enough to re...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, may, so, then, therefore, while, as to, such as, first of all, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1644.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21904761905 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01948655698 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561904761905 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 526.5 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.738271402 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.2 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.75 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.9 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 3.9879759519 326% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249923893137 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0745337908463 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0531943414062 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137509361471 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0441276000134 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.7 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.