There is an opinion that machine translation is not as fast and correct as human one and the future of translation is decided in favor of humankind. Nevertheless, the opposite state gives that future is in the hands of intelligent machines,

Essay topics:

        There is an opinion that machine translation is not as fast and correct as human one and the future of translation is decided in favor of humankind. Nevertheless, the opposite state gives that future is in the hands of intelligent machines, which are highly developed nowadays.

It is beyond doubt that modern technologies are crucially progressing from day to day. Indeed, people did not even have a simple phone less than fifty years ago, but now almost everybody owns a smartphone which gives access to huge knowledge from the pocket, including machine translation.  Moreover, the artificial intelligence has created an enormous opportunity for implementing accumulated knowledge in systems for translations, which, in turn, could be done in extremely short time today. Unfortunately, translation accuracy still depends on the existing rule bases and human intelligence. I suppose that, even if machine translations are not as accurate as human ones, it does not mean that the situation will not change for the better in a few years.
                On the other hand, it is important to note that languages are changing rapidly, too. In addition, the same language may have several different accents, which are individual for the regions but still have the same main bases. Moreover, modern internet society creates many new words daily to communicate faster through the internet and those words become widespread slang in real life. In this case, it is vitally necessary to update language bases for machine translation in time.
                To sum it up, I would like to say that modern artificial intelligence is bringing more and more opportunities to create new systems for machine translation. However, those systems rely on the language bases and should be up-to-date, but, actually, it still needs to be developed.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-06-30 maxrainy 56 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 216, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'several'.
Suggestion: several
...In addition, the same language may have several different accents, which are individual for the r...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, however, if, may, moreover, so, still, i suppose, in addition, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1465.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 245.0 315.596192385 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.97959183673 5.12529762239 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 8.18128012232 2.80592935109 292% => Word_Length_SD is high.
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.632653061224 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 410.4 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.2386665233 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.181818182 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2727272727 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.63636363636 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0540173242243 0.244688304435 22% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0380864941109 0.084324248473 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0438849556243 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0532057583921 0.151304729494 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0488075141174 0.056905535591 86% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.7 12.4159519038 143% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.7795591182 167% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.