Today, the advanced science and technology have made great changes to people’s life, but artists such as musicians, painters and writers are still highly valued. What can arts tell us about life that science and technology cannot?
It is irrefutable that the science and technology have advanced rapidly and have helped in many ways. Such advancements can be seen in many places such as corporate offices and hospitals. However, the utmost importance is still given to the artists such as musicians, painters and writers because of their peaceful and inspiring creativities.
From education to corporate sectors, and from hospitals to securities, the technology has brought significant changes in many fields that have facilitated people’s life. Now, students the world over can attend virtual classes from anywhere with the help of internet. Business firms can operate and deal in many countries because of the high-speed web. Identifying diseases and finding a solution has become easy and reliable by modern machines. Keeping an eye on crimes and tracking a criminal is possible with the help of advanced cameras and data clouds. Therefore, the technology has helped individuals to grow and live happily and healthy. For instance, as per the research of NASA, the literacy rate of the world has risen from 33% to 71% within last 20 years.
Artists who produce beautiful songs, startling pictures, and inspiring stories are highly valued because they give mental peace and encourage innovation. Technology may not be able to help to a greater extent when it comes to an individual’s mental peace. However, listening to music, seeing paintings and reading books are considered as a great source of enjoyment and mental peace. Music gives relaxation and beautiful paintings give peace as well as reading books make people rich in knowledge and encourage to learn and grow in life. Not only does it give a peace of mind, it also encourages people to be innovative and grow. To illustrate, People who frequently listen songs and read books tend to be more happy and very creative.
In conclusion, Technology has done tremendous changes in the betterment of people’s life which cannot be undervalued. But, people still are attracted by the astonishing and sterling work done by artists that benefits the mental health of people.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-10-14 | Chirag Bhardwaj | 56 | view |
| 2020-10-14 | Chirag Bhardwaj | 78 | view |
- The main purpose of public libraries is to provide books and they shouldn t waste their limited resources and spaces on providing expensive hi tech media such as computer software videos and DVDs To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
- When families have a meal together it is considered social activity Do you think eating together is important to people in your country 80
- Wild animals have no place in the 21st century and the protection is a waste of resources To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- A pet belonging to a friend of yours recently passed away Write a letter to console your friend In your letter include Your condolences What kind of animal it was Something you think will raise your friend s spirits 73
- Write about the following topic Do you think extra curricular activities are important in a student s life Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience Write at least 250 words 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 512, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'learning'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'encourage' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: learning
... people rich in knowledge and encourage to learn and grow in life. Not only does it give...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, still, therefore, well, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 10.4138276553 230% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1772.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 339.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22713864307 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79131186601 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563421828909 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 549.9 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.3570568244 49.4020404114 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 98.4444444444 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8333333333 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.83333333333 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268701314938 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0747063217243 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0662307459655 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167278692169 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0682551388177 0.056905535591 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.