Today dependency on computers has increased in every field of life. Do you think this excessive use of computer can damage person’s skills?
In recent times, excessive reliance on information technologies has increased in every sphere of life. While some people believe that this dependence cay deteriorate social skill of a person, I believe that the advantages of computers far outweigh slight disadvantages of it.
Undoubtedly, internet has compelled majority of the people to live an isolated life that cause their communication skill to deteriorate. To put it another way, nowadays, people are so busy with their work life that they don’t have much time to attend in a social get together which leads them to chat with their mates on the virtual world. For example, majority of the people, especially the younger generation, prefer to spend long time chatting in social media e.g. Facebook rather than having face to face conversation. As a result, people are becoming aloof and socially withdrawn and losing their communication skill eventually.
Nevertheless, positive impacts the communication technologies have far outweighed the ignorable drawbacks resulted from it. Digital communication has reached to a great height which world has never witnessed before. In another words, people are now able to establish communication with the recipient residing in a far place even across the border of the country with the help of internet. For example, students are now communicating with the teachers based in other countries to understand a more complex matter. This improved communication has not only eased import activities for businessman, but also enabled a patient to contact with doctors in foreign countries.
In conclusion, although some people believe that computers and gadget are doing harm to society, I emphasize that these are putting substantial positive influences on both individual and the society.ple, majority of the people, especially the younger generation, prefer to spend long time chatting in social media e.g. Facebook rather than having face to face conversation. As a result, people are becoming aloof and socially withdrawn and losing their communication skill eventually.
Nevertheless, positive impacts the communication technologies have far outweighed the ignorable drawbacks resulted from it. Digital communication has reached to a great height which world has never witnessed before. In another words, people are now able to establish communication with the recipient residing in a far place even across the border of the country with the help of internet. For example, students are now communicating with the teachers based in other countries to understand a more complex matter. This improved communication has not only eased import activities for businessman, but also enabled a patient to contact with doctors in foreign countries.
In conclusion, although some people believe that computers and gadget are doing harm to society, I emphasize that these are putting substantial positive influences on both individual and the society.
- It has been observed that in many countries notenough students are choosing to study science subjects at university. What do you think are the causes of theproblem?. What are the effects on society 56
- Your neighbors have recently written to you to complain about the noise from your House/ flat. Write a letter to your Neighbors in your letterExplain the reasons for the NoiseApologizeDescribe what action you will take 56
- Feyisayo Offeyi:Question- people are living in a throwaway society, using things for a short time and throwing them away. What is the causes of this?What problems does it lead to? 61
- As computers are being used more and more in education, there will be soon no role for teachers in the classroom. To what extent do you agree 89
- School uniforms, which are modes if identification in schools should be banned.to what extent do you agree or disagree. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, e.g., if, nevertheless, so, while, for example, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 41.998997996 157% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2507.0 1615.20841683 155% => OK
No of words: 449.0 315.596192385 142% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.58351893096 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60321845022 4.20363070211 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07064843334 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.378619153675 0.561755894193 67% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 792.0 506.74238477 156% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.0817529095 49.4020404114 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.947368421 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6315789474 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.47368421053 7.06120827912 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0996226870671 0.244688304435 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0365371954604 0.084324248473 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0509169552704 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0783577389686 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.082191350789 0.056905535591 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.38 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.