In today's job market it is far more important to have practical skills than theoretical knowledge. In the future, job applicants may not need any formal qualifications. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In contemporary life, competitiveness of job opportunities is becoming prevalent tendency. It is argued that hand-on skills will be more crucial than academic knowledge, thus in the future job market, it would be not necessary for job seekers to hold academic qualifications. In my opinion, I partially agree with this point of view.
On the one hand, there are numerous jobs that recruiters favor people who have working experience over those holding formal qualifications. These jobs are largely in need of employees' traits and ability to deal with dilemma rather than theoretical knowledge. Their working experience helps to resolve issues effectively as well as improving work productivity. For example, with manual job as housekeeping in a hotel, employees can start to work after several sessions being trained. Working result could depend on their prudence and responsibility. However, how could them access to technological advances adopted in their career, which requires basic knowledge in the future? How would they suggest an optimal solution?
On the other hand, it is unquestionable that formal education plays a critical role in helping individuals to enter job market. This can be explained by the fact that graduating students have been furnished in-depth knowledge and useful skills for their future occupations. As a result, they could make greater contribution to organizations than those without academic qualifications. Some professions that require high accuracy as medical science, nano technology cannot hire people who do not have basic knowledge or expertise.
In conclusion, although practical skills tend to an important part for job seekers in job market, I believe that academic education is superior for them not only to be got job, but also help to be promoted in future career.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-29 | learnafren | 78 | view |
| 2019-06-06 | sharanyam | 73 | view |
| 2019-03-26 | Jamie Dung Tran | 73 | view |
| 2019-03-25 | Jamie Dung Tran | 73 | view |
| 2019-02-26 | bhatvishal@ | 56 | view |
- These days people in some countries are living in a “throwaway” society which means people use things in a short time then throw them away. What are its causes and what impacts can it have? 89
- In today's job market it is far more important to have practical skills than theoretical knowledge. In the future, job applicants may not need any formal qualifications. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- In today's job market it is far more important to have practical skills than theoretical knowledge. In the future, job applicants may not need any formal qualifications. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- Some people say that now we can see films on our phones or tablets there is no need to go to the cinema. Others say that to be fully enjoyed, films need to be seen in a cinema. Discuss both these views and give your opinion. 73
- Some people believe that we can use animals the way we want while others believe animals have rights and we must respect their rights What is your opinion Use specific reasons to support your point of view 79
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, thus, well, for example, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1537.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45035460993 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08534481837 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.620567375887 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 484.2 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.2353843799 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.466666667 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248681268604 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0748355162553 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0690306766313 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161866137823 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.034881583918 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.