In today's job market it is far more important to have practical skills than theoretical knowledge. In the future, job applicants may not need any formal qualifications. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In contemporary life, competitiveness of job opportunities is becoming prevalent tendency. Some people argue that hand-on skills will be more crucial than academic knowledge, thus in the future job market, it would be not necessary for job seekers to hold academic qualifications. In my opinion, I partially agree with this point of view.
On the one hand, there are a range of jobs that recruiters favor people who have working experience over those holding formal qualifications. These jobs are largely in need of employees' traits, abilities to deal with dilemma than theoretical knowledge. Their working experience helps to resolve issues effectively as well as improves work productivity. For example, manual job as housekeeping in a hotel, employees can start to work after several sessions being trained. Working result could depend on their prudence and responsibility. However, how could they access to technological advances adopted in their career, which requires basic knowledge in the future? How would they suggest an optimal solution?
On the other hand, it is unquestionable that formal education plays a critical role in helping people to enter job market. This can be explained by the fact that graduating students have been furnished in-depth knowledge, useful skills for their future occupations. As a result, they could make greater contribution to organizations than those without academic qualifications. Some professions that need high accuracy as medical science, nanotechnology cannot hire people who do not have basic knowledge or ability.
In conclusion, although practical skills tend to be an important part for job seekers in job market, I believe that academic education is superior for them not only to get job, but also help them to be promoted in future career.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-29 | learnafren | 78 | view |
| 2019-06-06 | sharanyam | 73 | view |
| 2019-03-26 | Jamie Dung Tran | 73 | view |
| 2019-03-25 | Jamie Dung Tran | 73 | view |
| 2019-02-26 | bhatvishal@ | 56 | view |
- In today's job market it is far more important to have practical skills than theoretical knowledge. In the future, job applicants may not need any formal qualifications. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- These days people in some countries are living in a “throwaway” society which means people use things in a short time then throw them away. What are its causes and what impacts can it have? 89
- In many countries, the level of crime is increasing and crimes are becoming more violent. Why do you think this is and what can be done about it. 89
- Some parents buy their children whatever they ask for, and allow theirchildren to do whatever they want. Is this a good way to raise children? Whatconsequences could this style of parenting have for children as they getolder? 67
- In today's job market it is far more important to have practical skills than theoretical knowledge. In the future, job applicants may not need any formal qualifications. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, thus, well, for example, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1521.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43214285714 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10264658257 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610714285714 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 479.7 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.3089144286 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.4 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6666666667 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257711645641 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0779065300805 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0672173842608 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167317892816 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0289549059517 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.