Too much money is wasted on exploring the oceans, this money will be better spent else where. Discuss both views.
Rivers, seas and oceans make 70% of the area on planet earth, where oceans form the largest water bodies. Some people think treasures lie hidden beneath these large water bodies and must be explored, despite expenditure. Whereas others believe that money must not be wasted on exploring oceans. This essay will discuss both the aspects of given topic.
The earth consists of 70% water and 30% land areas, where more than 70% water area comprises of oceans. Fortunes are being spent on exploring the hidden treasures beneath these large water bodies. On going researches and development of high technology gadgets in order to find, better alternates for fuels, consumption of this salty water after conversion into sweet drinkable form consumes high amounts in annual budgets of first world countries. The scientists are working on extraction of fossil fuels, hidden beneath the soils and rocks of these deep oceans. South Africa is currently suffering from scarcity of drinkable water, the researches and expenses on conversion of salty sea and ocean water would provide ample water for free consumption of human beings. Current situation of this scarcity and water deprivation demands urgent solution to this rising problem worldwide, in order to save life. Therefore, people supporting and advocating the expense on exploring oceans are looking at the greater picture, and trying to take measures for the support of humanity in years to come.
The other group of people that advocates expenditure of money and allocation for shorter terms, that includes fulfillment of basic needs of humanity worldwide including shelter, clean drinking water, three meals a day and basic education worldwide.The total expenditure on sending a team into deep waters for exploring alternate fuels and increasing the consumable water reserves, reaches thousands of dollars. This group lays great stress on serving the humanity and giving a better life today, which according to them would bring a better future as a result. This group condemns the expenditure of fortunes on a selected group of researchers and scientists, rather supports the expenditure of funds across the world. The malnourished children of Nigeria deserve more attention according to the people supporting this ideology. More literate people after a decade or two would help in better researches in future.
Considering both the aspects that fortunes must be spent on exploring oceans and spending else where has its own advantages and disadvantages, differing in short and long term results.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-09-07 | Dr Rana Zuhair | 73 | view |
- Learning about the past has no value for those of us living in the present.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
- The international community must act immediately to ensure all nations to reduce their consumption of fossil fuels e.g. gas and oil. 89
- The international community must act immediately to ensure all nations to reduce their consumption of fossil fuels e.g. gas and oil. 61
- in countries where unemployment is high, education should only be obligatory up to primary school and not secondary school. to what extent do you agree or disagree. 58
- Too much money is wasted on exploring the oceans, this money will be better spent else where. Discuss both views. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 222, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... must be explored, despite expenditure. Whereas others believe that money must not be w...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 84, Rule ID: COMPRISES_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'comprises' or 'consists of'?
Suggestion: comprises; consists of
...d areas, where more than 70% water area comprises of oceans. Fortunes are being spent on exp...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 198, Rule ID: ON_GOING[1]
Message: Did you mean 'ongoing'?
Suggestion: Ongoing
...sures beneath these large water bodies. On going researches and development of high tech...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 249, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...als a day and basic education worldwide.The total expenditure on sending a team int...
^^^
Line 5, column 905, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
... or two would help in better researches in future. Considering both the aspects that f...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, look, so, therefore, whereas, in short, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 41.998997996 143% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2155.0 1615.20841683 133% => OK
No of words: 401.0 315.596192385 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37406483791 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47492842339 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65211002816 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551122194514 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 650.7 506.74238477 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 81.8700125928 49.4020404114 166% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.764705882 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5882352941 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.64705882353 7.06120827912 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215506165047 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0772069530702 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0778401579568 0.0667982634062 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152613963932 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0641042689792 0.056905535591 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 78.4519038076 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.