The tourism industry has grown enormously over the last fifty years, and there are few places which are unaffected by it. However, tourism rarely benefits the countries which tourists visit.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Over the last five decades, tourism has experienced a huge rise as an industry, only few places are remaining good and clean without its impact. Although many countries have attractive tourist destinations, it serves a little reward to the countries. In my opinion, I agree that the tourism has polluted many places and countries which tourists visit are not getting enough profit.
Firstly, international tourism has become very inexpensive which impetuses people to explore overseas. Almost every places in this planet, from Amazon rain forests to Sahara's fervent desert, have been toured by humans. The problem with tourists is, most of them are not treating the places with respect, they throw wastes everywhere and that ruins the entire nature of the spot. For an example, a group of individuals who goes for a deep sea trip will leave food wastes, cans and plastic in the ocean which are perilous objects to the marines. Furthermore, forest trekking and camping which are most favored activities among tourists always have been prone to forest fire otherwise clear rules are followed. Many places in this planet had seen these aforesaid disasters and very few sites are untouched.
Secondly, if we compare the goodness that countries which tourists often explore receive with the demerits that the tourism brings, a clear zero-sum can be seen. Recently, third world countries are peoples favorite vacation spots. Even though those countries attract many travelers, economically tourism is not being a decent contributor to them. This can be exemplified by doing a small research on the internet comparing annual visitors and their role on that particular nation's financial statistics. While a myriad of disadvantages in having vacationers, vacationing scarcely do good to the local people by creating various jobs.
In conclusion, tourers had abused a plethora of wonderful sceneries and we have sporadic unpolluted wild life and ocean. I believe that tourism is not doing justice to the host countries as the loss is huge and nature is being ill-treated.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-07-15 | nands71191 | 73 | view |
| 2020-07-15 | nands71191 | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-25 | Gunadharshini | 90 | view |
| 2018-05-01 | aymnga2007 | 69 | view |
- The tourism industry has grown enormously over the last fifty years and there are few places which are unaffected by it However tourism rarely benefits the countries which tourists visit To what extent do you agree or disagree 90
- It is generally accepted that exercise is good for children and teenagers. Therefore, physical education and sport should be compulsory for all students in all schools. What do you think? 61
- More and more business and individuals are choosing to communicate either professionally or socially using technology rather than being face to face. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of using technology for communicating 84
- ou have a problem with a neighbour.Write a letter to your neighbor. in your letter. Describe the problem. say how long it has been a problem.. Explain what action you want the neighbors to take 73
- You have a problem with a neighbour.Write a letter your neighbour. In your letterDescribe the problem.Say how long it has been a problem.Explain what action you want the neighbour to take. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 380, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'small research'.
Suggestion: small research
... them. This can be exemplified by doing a small research on the internet comparing annual visito...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, third, while, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1739.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 330.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2696969697 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69235048756 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627272727273 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 538.2 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.3352308157 49.4020404114 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 108.6875 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.625 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.125 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251306171623 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.078381979037 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0690049087645 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152924452431 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0800090576094 0.056905535591 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.