wdnsdjkfsdsdfc hdsad

Essay topics:

wdnsdjkfsdsdfc hdsad

Some people think there should be some competitive spirit in children whereas some think that children who were taught to co-operate will become more useful adults rather than who compete. Further, i would account that both has their own pros and cons which can be viewed in the following essay.

On the one hand, A sense of competitive spirit must be encouraged in children which leads to their success in future. When they induce racing spirit in their studies or games, they definitely work on it to be first in everything which leads to many achievements in their life in spite it also brings success. At the same time children should be thought where to have competition and where to not be. For example, being ruthless encourage one to enter into different sports fields which brings them many medals by playing in different sectors which indirectly helps our nation.

On the flip side, children should also be encouraged to work together with others which helps them to develop group working in different fields. For example, if a group of children has given a project to do together there they should know how to work simultaneously by discussing each and every point. Here ths w3 se1deergh 1ey should not be competitive which inde 09,ed lead to failure of a work or leaving in between. And also if at all it comes to sports like football or kabaddi one should know how to play together they must have coordination between them which lead them to winning.

To recapitulate, every children must be taught both being competitive and at the same time being co-operate to each other. The children who knows the difference between them and who can apply them based on their situation they can become a more useful adults for the companies Sor industries in their future.

Votes
Average: 1.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-18 rajesh417 11 view
Essays by user rajesh417 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 177, Rule ID: IN_WHO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whom'?
Suggestion: whom
...l become more useful adults rather than who compete. Further, i would account that ...
^^^
Line 1, column 199, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...dults rather than who compete. Further, i would account that both has their own p...
^
Line 3, column 108, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...n children which leads to their success in future. When they induce racing spirit in thei...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 365, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...1ey should not be competitive which inde 09,ed lead to failure of a work or leavi...
^^
Line 5, column 521, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ddi one should know how to play together they must have coordination between them...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, so, whereas, for example

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 7.30460921844 233% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1485.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85294117647 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50567513403 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.490196078431 0.561755894193 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 445.5 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 33.7691303807 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.75 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.41666666667 7.06120827912 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.244688304435 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.084324248473 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667982634062 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.151304729494 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.056905535591 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 50.2224549098 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.25 8.58950901804 84% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 78.4519038076 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.