What are the pros and cons of using public transport?

Essay topics:

What are the pros and cons of using public transport?

Two days ago, I read an article about the importance of public transport in cities. In the article, some politicians state that it brings a great deal of benefits to citizens. However, some car owners argue that it also causes many problems. In this essay, I will discuss both pros and cons of municipal transport.

Let us start with advantages of public transportation. The first merit is that it usually allows people to commute in the city at relatively cheap cost. Citizens, who own no vehicle, can cheaply travel to either university or office by bus and trolleys, because these vehicles are both widely available and affordable to everyone within urban areas. Another positive side is that it frequently contributes to the reduction of traffic congestions. The number of cars tend to decrease in cities with developed civil transportation, since people readily change their preferences in favor of comfortable buses as well as subways. Therefore, after analyzing, it is clear that municipal transportation is beneficial for cities.

Nevertheless, despite these beneficial effects, public transport has numerous negative sides. Firstly, it often destroys roads. The roads in cities crumble quickly, since the weight of buses is normally approximate to the maximum weight, which roads can endure, but the frequent usage of them exhausts their qualities. Secondly, they damage the appearance of cities. The owners of public transport are prone to use the empty space on their buses for advertisement, but it commonly spoils the overall view of the city owing to its inconsistency with the common architecture. As a result, after considering, it is obvious that public transport is detrimental for urban area.

In conclusion, even though civil transport, such as buses and subways, have plenty of positives, it also causes many difficulties for cities.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-11-07 carwyn 56 view
2024-11-06 TranNgoc123 73 view
2024-11-06 Thái Nhật Linh 84 view
2024-09-17 Anmol Bal 78 view
2024-09-01 Anmol Bal 78 view

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1576.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36054421769 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96903513035 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.62925170068 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 495.9 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 52.659249328 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.7058823529 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2941176471 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.23529411765 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220460873141 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0627626791095 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0785333623004 0.0667982634062 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120543318466 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0702387916234 0.056905535591 123% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.51 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.47 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.