You see a request for articles in a magazine We invite you to write about The Future of Travel In what ways do you think travel will be different in the future In what ways might it still be the same The writer of the best article will win a prize Write y

Thanks to the rapid technology growth, numerous types of travel methods are going to be available in the less-distant future. Having a trip across the continent by a single launch or visiting universal by rocket might offer satisfaction to people. This essay will state my opinion.
In modern society, multiple affluent nations like Japan have built a wide range of railway systems with a brand new high-speed rail route across the country to serve commuters. This allows travelers to access the latest technology vehicle with ease by presenting the identity card or the passport. As a matter of fact, thanks to the latest high-speed rail, it takes visitors only 9 hours straight from Hong Kong to Beijing in China by train with a better price compared to the plane. This type of vehicle has been recently so popular due to cost-saving that developing countries are in an attempt to upgrade this kind of transportation.
Besides, travelling all over the planet in the orbit can come to reality, it is just a matter of years. For instance, a well-known technology cooperation called SpaceX is researching and developing a brand new rocket that allows people to travel thousands of miles in one hour, and gradually, the price will be lowered as a growth of technology. However, visitors could miss a series of spectacular scenes when it comes to traveling too fast, which are less interesting for those people who desire to enjoy the local's lives.
In conclusion, as currently railway system has been upgraded by affluent nations with the latest high-speed rail, travelling by train might be the top selection in the future due to cost-saving. And using the rocket people can travel the rest of the world in an hour.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, so, well, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, as a matter of fact

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1429.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9446366782 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74796260452 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588235294118 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 437.4 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.0913382988 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.083333333 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0833333333 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.08333333333 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.115847514903 0.244688304435 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0439223393462 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0350702267672 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0801126551281 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0396085163761 0.056905535591 70% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.