The younger generation is mainly responsible for latest technological developments. How far do you agree?
These days, the role of young people in progress of contemporary technology is increasing sharply. Some politicians claim that growing population are required to take responsibility for this progress, while some teachers are opposed to them and argue this obligation lies with others. In this essay, I will discuss both opinions and agree with teachers.
Let us start by looking at the reasons why some politicians argue that youngsters ought to lead the most recent technological evolution. The first reason is that they are more creative in developing technology. They tend to come up with original ideas easily, so that they can make a great contribution to cutting-edge advances. Another reason is that they have more spare time to spend on development. In contrast to adults, young people can allocate a considerable amount of time to this development, because they both have no families to take care and job to do. After the consideration of the reasons, it is clear that growing generation should take the lead in this improvement.
On the other hand, some teachers believe that the youth should be responsible for state-of-the-art advancement. They justify their point of view with the following arguments. First of all, they are expected to have proper childhood instead of deal with technology. If children played a major role in developing technology, then they would suffer from lack of social skills, since they would not have normal childhood to develop necessary skills for life in society. Secondly, they are not thoroughly experienced in ensuring technological development. Young people can make a crucial mistake in this progress and, therefore, ruin projects, as they are inexperienced as well as cannot take account of important features. After the analysis of these argumentations, it is obvious that young people must not participate in technological development.
In conclusion, even though some politicians make a statement that latest technological progress predominantly lies with young people, personally, I believe that they should not meddle with it.
- In many countries, very few people read newspapers or follow the news on TV.What do you think are the causes of this?What solutions can you suggest? 78
- Human activity has had a negative impact on plants and animals around the world. Some people think that this cannot be changed, while others believe actions can be taken to bring about a change.Discuss both and give your opinion. 84
- The television is good for you.Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of watching television.Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. 61
- Levels of youth crime are increasing rapidly in most cities around the world What are the reasons for this and suggest some solutions 84
- Some people think the best way to solve global environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel.To what extent do you agree? 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 212, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...onsibility for this progress, while some teachers are opposed to them and argue t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, look, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, well, while, in conclusion, in contrast, as well as, first of all, in contrast to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1762.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38837920489 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11774862653 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553516819572 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 544.5 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 2.10420841683 428% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.3946597368 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.647058824 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2352941176 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.47058823529 7.06120827912 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114723887054 0.244688304435 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0380682336024 0.084324248473 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0277553062741 0.0667982634062 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0726823487364 0.151304729494 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0150882836939 0.056905535591 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.