000
As everything of life like as a coin that has two different sides, people must weigh the pros and cons before jumping to conclusion. After all, each and every questions or topic requires careful deliberation in that there are always multiple variables to a truth. Even though some may adamantly believe that it is a bad idea to hold watching the news and take a break, I strongly think such opinion lack coherence to some extent. In my humble opinion, it would be more effective to reduce the proliferation of bad news if we do not watch news and take a break for following reasons.
Firstly, If we do not watch fake news from the various kinds of TV channel then it may reduce target rating point and they will feel uncomfortable about it. For example, one of my country’s TV channel was trying to telecast some fake news against our country and people of our county were angry about it. They decided to give that channel a lesson and tried to unsubscribe and stopped watching that channel. After a few days, the owner of that TV channel figured out that the target rating point was decreasing day by day. As a result, the owner of that TV channel felt sorry to the people of our country and started to telecast original and neutral news.
Secondly, Fake news may create a lot of conflictions in our society. If we do not allow people to use it then definitely it will create a positive result. For instance, During the national election in our country, people were trying to make fake status against election commissioner in the social media and it created a lot of violences among the citizen of our country. Then the government did not allow using Facebook in our country. After few days, the situation had become under controlled and the authority again permitted them to use Facebook.
Finally, it’s virtually impossible to provide a completely satisfying answer to an open-ended question. Although the jury may be out on this given essay topic, we can come to a mutual agreement that it may be better to stop watching the news and take a break due to the reasons and details mentioned above.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-10-13 | Ilya Kulikov | 73 | view |
| 2020-10-13 | Ilya Kulikov | 83 | view |
| 2020-10-13 | Ilya Kulikov | 73 | view |
| 2019-09-05 | alex05622 | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-17 | zeeryan | 60 | view |
- ETS book about the professors appearance on TV to show academic research 76
- Do you agree or disagree that you should be creative to be successful? 70
- some people think that zoos are cruel and should be closed, other people believe that zoos serve useful functions,which view point do you support? 70
- in twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than today?agree or not 60
- Its better to have broad knowledge in many academic subjects than to have a specialize in one specific subject. 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 69, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...e a lot of conflictions in our society. If we do not allow people to use it then d...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, after all, for example, for instance, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1739.0 1977.66487455 88% => OK
No of words: 373.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.66219839142 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39467950092 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58334885806 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.538873994638 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 549.9 618.680645161 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 3.51792114695 256% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.3202054085 48.9658058833 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.6875 100.406767564 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3125 20.6045352989 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.9375 5.45110844103 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.236089414692 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.076458572812 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0737576698707 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.150856017488 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0645574589148 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 11.7677419355 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 10.9000537634 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 86.8835125448 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.