73. In the future, students may have the choice of studying at home by using technology such as computers or television or studying at traditional schools. Which would you prefer? Use specific reasons to support your answer.
We are living in a very fast developing world. It seems to me that we can find and learn many things on a computer with the help of the internet. We are also able to gain much knowledge that books contain. Some people would like to learn through the internet. However, in my opinion, I desire to develop my understanding in traditional school. I will support my choice with the following two main reasons.
First of all, I am able to concentrate in my studying much better than without having a teacher. When I studied by myself, or learn online, I did not know how to learn effectively. Moreover, I was often distracted from my studying by a number of entertainments, such as Facebook, games, interesting songs and movies. To be more specific, when I finished high school, I desired to study English, registered a course online; however, when I began, I was not able to practice following my schedule; I missed a lot of lessons. Then, I found a teacher who taught me for two months, so my English skills got better.
Second, I can learn both academic knowledge and experience from teachers. There are many teachers with abundant teaching experience who are always willing to instruct and help me in my studying. Moreover, the teachers whom have already gained knowledge will share with me their experiences which I cannot easily to find anywhere else. For example, as I said above, I used to study English by myself, but I did not gain any results, after that I went to a center and studied with a teacher. She taught me how to curve my tongue to have the sound like native speaker. She shared with me her experiences how to think in English and to learn new words effectively.
In conclusion, people have different ideas about choosing to study online or traditional school. In my point of view, I prefer studying at traditional school to online.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-06-17 | hoangtuyet | 87 | view |
- TPO-42 - Integrated Writing Task Glass is a favored building material for modern architecture, yet it is also very dangerous for wild birds. Because they often cannot distinguish between glass and open air, millions of birds are harmed every year when the 75
- TPO-15 - Integrated Writing Task The cane toad is a large (1.8 kg) amphibian species native to Central and South America. It was deliberately introduced to Australia in 1935 with the expectation that it would protect farmers' crops by eating harmful insec 65
- TPO-24 - Integrated Writing Task Animal fossils usually provide very little opportunity to study the actual animal tissues, because in fossils the animals' living tissues have been largely replaced by minerals. Thus, scientists were very excited recently 71
- TPO-12 - Integrated Writing Task Jane Austen (1775-1817) is one of the most famous of all English novelists, and today her novels are more popular than ever, with several recently adapted as Hollywood movies. But we do not have many records of what she lo 80
- TPO-10 - Integrated Writing Task The sea otter is a small mammal that lives in waters along the western coast of North America from California to Alaska. When some sea otter populations off the Alaskan coast started rapidly declining a few years ago, it c 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, moreover, second, so, then, for example, in conclusion, such as, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1533.0 1977.66487455 78% => OK
No of words: 327.0 407.700716846 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.6880733945 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75328558405 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 212.727598566 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.544342507645 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 476.1 618.680645161 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 17.0 9.59856630824 177% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.5080485885 48.9658058833 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.6842105263 100.406767564 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2105263158 20.6045352989 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.47368421053 5.45110844103 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142346032865 0.236089414692 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0475109897851 0.076458572812 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.053606526974 0.0737576698707 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103053805935 0.150856017488 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0599951104816 0.0645574589148 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 11.7677419355 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.63 10.9000537634 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.47 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 86.8835125448 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.002688172 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.