The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily.
Nowadays, it is commonly accepted that most of the people aspecially young people easily make new friends but they most of them have serious problem to keeping their older firsnd for long time. It is led to we today in the society observe very little deep relationship between young people. Contrary, to this popul;ar beliefs there are still those who argue that trying to maintain friendship for a long time is very difficult work in the new life style and people can be happy just by making new friend and keeping this relationship even for a short time. I, to a great extent, agree with this idea that the ability of maintain friendship for a long time even with small number of people is a advantage for happiness than ability of make many friend.
First and fore most, a strong relationship that can be provide confidence between people establieshed only troough spending long time together. We do not need our friend just for having some short happy time with them. But, we need them for all different condition in our life. For example, when we feeling very upset, we want to speak about it with a close friend who is really confident and we sure that who can preseve our mayter with yourself. This kind of friendship create only along long time. In my opinion it is not reasonable to getting personal imformation to a person that I know who just for a few time.
on another significant fact that should be taken into the consideration is that peolpe who make a new friend a lot but have not deep root relationship with them always feeling ther are alone. our old friend are as same as our family. we try to do each kind of help to them and also they do too. For example, in the last year I had a seminar in the university and unfortunately happened a probelem for me and I could not to prepaied for the seminal. When I want from some student that I know them recently all of them say to me that could not help not help to me. But, one of my old friend saggested to hand me to I can prepar for seminar for example help to design of slids.
On the basis of reasons that mentioned above, I am convienced that maintaining the old friend is more important that make a lot new friend for a short time. Because, a deep and real friendship just create in a long time and knowing people is possible only during long time.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-03 | sonyeoso | 80 | view |
| 2023-04-10 | KimiaKermanshahian | 76 | view |
| 2023-03-15 | MichelleGAOOO | 70 | view |
| 2022-12-14 | HSNDEK | 73 | view |
| 2022-11-24 | AT2G38040 | 70 | view |
- Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- TPO 49 INTEGRATED 73
- Young people enjoy life more than older people do 76
- TPO-39- In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure, successful future. 71
- tpo 33 68
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 693, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ime even with small number of people is a advantage for happiness than ability of...
^
Line 1, column 740, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun friend seems to be countable; consider using: 'many friends'.
Suggestion: many friends
...tage for happiness than ability of make many friend. First and fore most, a strong relatio...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 539, Rule ID: IT_IS_JJ_TO_VBG[1]
Message: Did you mean 'get'?
Suggestion: get
.... In my opinion it is not reasonable to getting personal imformation to a person that I...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 607, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun time seems to be countable; consider using: 'few times'.
Suggestion: few times
... to a person that I know who just for a few time. on another significant fact that sho...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: On
... that I know who just for a few time. on another significant fact that should be...
^^
Line 3, column 193, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Our
...ith them always feeling ther are alone. our old friend are as same as our family. w...
^^^
Line 3, column 235, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: We
...r old friend are as same as our family. we try to do each kind of help to them and...
^^
Line 3, column 450, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “When” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... could not to prepaied for the seminal. When I want from some student that I know th...
^^^^
Line 3, column 539, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'not help'.
Suggestion: not help
...cently all of them say to me that could not help not help to me. But, one of my old friend sagges...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, really, so, still, for example, kind of, in my opinion, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.0286738351 181% => OK
Pronoun: 58.0 43.0788530466 135% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1894.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 430.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.40465116279 4.8611393121 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55372829156 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41331711825 2.67179642975 90% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.455813953488 0.524837075471 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 592.2 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.8166223251 48.9658058833 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.222222222 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8888888889 20.6045352989 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.55555555556 5.45110844103 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.5376344086 163% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.39613890924 0.236089414692 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126921990109 0.076458572812 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.138050782004 0.0737576698707 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.263367685712 0.150856017488 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.14061406996 0.0645574589148 218% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 11.7677419355 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 58.1214874552 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.54 10.9000537634 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.13 8.01818996416 89% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 86.8835125448 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 10.002688172 180% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.