After making a presentation in class, you want to evaluate it. Which of the following do you think would be better for you? 1. Watch the recording by yourself 2. Invite other attenders to discuss.
It goes without saying that making a presentation is one of the most challenging tasks during our education and even our professional lives. there has been a controversial debate among people having a presentation as to whether evaluating their speech by watching the recording is more beneficial than inviting other people to give their opinion. From my perspective, the best way to evaluate a speech or presentation is to be watched by other people, and my reasons to support my view point are elaborated upon hereunder.
To begin with, inviting attenders will reduce the probability of having stress and anxiety during making a presentation. It is not a secret to any one presentation needs to be done in front of maybe a huge number of individuals, which is the harder part, as a result we should prepare themselves for it. It is crystal clear that inviting attenders will definitely help us to control our feelings and behaviors since we already practiced it. In this vein we will learn how to make eye contact with audience, which is crucial in professional speech as it is a sign of self-confidence, in order to make a profound impression on them. To put it in more vivid picture, when I was in college I had to make a presentation in front of other collegians and professors it was so difficult for me since I am an introverted person, who is not interested to speak and communicate with other people, and I do not have an outgoing personality, but I decided to practice my presentation by the help of my friends; after two weeks, I learned how to control my feelings and make eye contact with attenders and I got a perfect score from that course. Had I not practiced with my friends for the presentation, I would not be able to escape from the clutches of fear and get such a good score. As you can see, audiences are one of the momentous parts of a presentation and we should learn how to attract them to our speech.
Furthermore, when a presentation is seen by attenders, it is more likely that the flaws and problems will be completely eliminated. As you know, different people have obviously different perspectives and experiences, meaning everybody comprehends things differently, this human trait is so helpful. Thus, attenders are able to tell us the downsides and upsides of our performance according to their point of view, we will therefore improve the way we present our speech. Sharing different opinions about a specific subject will illuminate other aspects of it that we cannot see. As you can see the difference among attenders’ views will make us able to promote the way we present and have a perfect speech in front of a large number of people.
In sum, not only will we feel more comfortable and confidence during speech, we will also be able to remove downsides as much as possible. Everybody should try to practice its presentation in front of other people.
- If you do not make sure other people know about your strengths and accomplishments you will never be successful in life 76
- Government should provide free access to the internet the individual should access to the internet without paying anything 73
- Which is the best way for the job interviewers and employers to better know the situation of a job applicant A contacting previous employers the job applicant worked for and asking for information B letting the job applicant work for the company for a sho 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- some people think it is the best approach for students to learn if school start the day at an early time in the morning But someone think the school should start the day at late time do you agree or disagree 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 142, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
...cation and even our professional lives. there has been a controversial debate among p...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 215, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
...bate among people having a presentation as to whether evaluating their speech by watching the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 718, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...t and have a perfect speech in front of a large number of people. In sum, not only will we feel ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, may, so, therefore, thus, as to, you know, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 63.0 43.0788530466 146% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 70.0 52.1666666667 134% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2392.0 1977.66487455 121% => OK
No of words: 503.0 407.700716846 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75546719682 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.73578520332 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98667774356 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 238.0 212.727598566 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.473161033797 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 759.6 618.680645161 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.1344086022 144% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 88.5638588445 48.9658058833 181% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.705882353 100.406767564 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.5882352941 20.6045352989 144% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.70588235294 5.45110844103 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222754094943 0.236089414692 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0729491439939 0.076458572812 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0331927859422 0.0737576698707 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129526669633 0.150856017488 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0509786528005 0.0645574589148 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 11.7677419355 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 58.1214874552 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.92 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 86.8835125448 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.002688172 150% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.0537634409 135% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.