agree or disagree that government have to spend money to improve internet access than improve public transportation
These days, government are responsible for people's comfort and they need to be more careful in making decisions specially for spending money, some believe that it is better for government to increase public transportation instead of accessing to the internet, as far as I am concern, I strongly believe that both of them are so important and help the society's comfort.
Firstly, in comparison with the past, internet is one of the significant things in people's lives and most people have online jobs that without accessing to the internet they can not be successful in their carriers, and also increasing the internet access helps the reduction of traffic because most people can do their work by internet and there is no need to go out, for example, there are many applications that people can use them to shop online or even pay the bills, I remember last year all internet access are cut by government, so people forced to go out to because of doing the thing that were done by internet before and the streets were so crowded.
secondly, increasing public transportation is as vital as accessing to the internet, because although there are different jobs that can be done by computer, many people need to go out of their house to work and get money like workers and employees and teachers and most them can not afford to have their own car and they need to go to their work by bus or subway, for instance, my father is a simple worker and he should get to his work on time early in the morning, so the best way for him is using subway so spending money for public transportation is so beneficial.
In conclusion, it is obvious that the responsibility of the government for people in the society is so significant and they have to pay attention to all kinds of people with different conditions of life to be happy and comfortable in their life, so spending money on internet access and public transportation have the same importance.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-08 | Pariabahmani | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-14 | ardned | 60 | view |
- agree or disagree that government have to spend money to improve internet access than improve public transportation 60
- tpo 48 3
- agree or disagree one of the best way parents can help their teenage children to prepare fot their adult life is to encourage them to take a part time job 71
- tpo-41 76
- tpo 44 65
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 7, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'days'' or 'day's'?
Suggestion: days'; day's
These days government are responsible for peoples ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Secondly
...fore and the streets were so crowded. secondly, increasing public transortation is as ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1598.0 1977.66487455 81% => OK
No of words: 341.0 407.700716846 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.6862170088 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74344838842 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 212.727598566 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.463343108504 0.524837075471 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 499.5 618.680645161 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 20.6003584229 19% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 85.0 20.1344086022 422% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 135.566404393 48.9658058833 277% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 399.5 100.406767564 398% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 85.25 20.6045352989 414% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 22.0 5.45110844103 404% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 11.8709677419 25% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201683765259 0.236089414692 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.151088951336 0.076458572812 198% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0444725316095 0.0737576698707 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151088951336 0.150856017488 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0444725316095 0.0645574589148 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 43.3 11.7677419355 368% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -6.34 58.1214874552 -11% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.10430107527 213% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 35.3 10.1575268817 348% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 11.11 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.35 8.01818996416 129% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 86.8835125448 62% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 27.5 10.002688172 275% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 36.0 10.0537634409 358% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.