Agree/Disagree: People who develop many different skills are more successful than people who just focus on only one skill.
There have been debates over whether it is better to develop many different skills or just focus on only one particular skill. In my opinion, a person who is versatile, is more likely to be productive and successful. My reasons and examples listed below will strengthen my point of view.
First of all, we are living in a world full of challenge. In order to be successful we have to be able to face different kinds of problems. Most of them are unexpected ones that cannot be predicted. Therefore, a person who has developed a variety of skills is more likely to be successful in dealing with them. For instance, when a computer is out of order, a computer specialist is able to fix it, but what if there is something wrong with the plumbing or wires in the house? He needs extra help to fix them. However, if he is versatile, he can easily face the problem. No one can deny the fact that people are dependent on one another in order to live and that is the result of civilization. People live in towns and cities and help one another to solve their problems. But being too dependent is not always pleasant. Suppose that there is a problem with the electrical of your house on Christmas holiday. If you have a little bit of knowledge about electrical, you will be able to solve the problem easily and you do not need to wait hours and hours for an electrician to show up.
Secondly, when a person is adept, he can do different things in his free time. He literally never gets bored because there are always plenty of choices for him. For instance, I have a friend who is an artist and is specialized in art. However, art is not the only thing that he is good at. He has so many other skills; from changing all the wires in the house to cleaning and painting the rooms. He never gets bored since he has always something on his mind to manage his vacant time productively. Developing many different skills is also good for our careers. For example, when a multitalented person loses his job, he can easily find another one in a different field. Therefore, he does not need to be worried about unemployment.
To sum up, focusing on only one particular field cannot help us to succeed in a world where things are not predictable. Developing different skills can help us to be less dependent on others as well as it is a good way to fill our leisure time
- Agree/Disagree: People who develop many different skills are more successful than people who just focus on only one skill. 76
- It has recently been announced that a large shopping center may be built in your neighborhood. Do you support or oppose this plan? Why? Use specific reasons and details to support your answer. 73
- The government can take a variety of actions to help protect the environment. Which one of the following do you think is the most important for the nation's government to take to protect the environment?1. Found research to develop environmentally friendl 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 62, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...es over whether it is better to develop many different skills or just focus on only one partic...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 923, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...use on Christmas holiday. If you have a little bit of knowledge about electrical, you will...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 510, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...is vacant time productively. Developing many different skills is also good for our careers. Fo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'then', 'therefore', 'well', 'for example', 'for instance', 'as well as', 'first of all', 'in my opinion', 'to sum up']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.172916666667 0.229887763892 75% => OK
Verbs: 0.179166666667 0.158761421928 113% => OK
Adjectives: 0.09375 0.0866891130778 108% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0729166666667 0.046263068375 158% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0770833333333 0.0685040099705 113% => OK
Prepositions: 0.114583333333 0.118717715034 97% => OK
Participles: 0.03125 0.0351676179071 89% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.58362237743 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0416666666667 0.0309702414327 135% => OK
Particles: 0.00416666666667 0.00188951952338 221% => OK
Determiners: 0.0666666666667 0.0887237588012 75% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.01875 0.0209618222197 89% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.01875 0.0139019557991 135% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2357.0 2387.08602151 99% => OK
No of words: 434.0 408.028673835 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43087557604 5.86048508987 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56428161445 4.48200974243 102% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.276497695853 0.338922669872 82% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.184331797235 0.251872472559 73% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.142857142857 0.174417080927 82% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.108294930876 0.112833075102 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58362237743 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 212.727598566 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.467741935484 0.524397521467 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 51.5159624131 59.2087087015 87% => OK
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6684587814 126% => OK
Sentence length: 16.6923076923 20.5533526081 81% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.261179232 48.84282405 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.6538461538 120.699889404 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6923076923 20.5533526081 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.653846153846 0.644075263715 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.5376344086 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.54480286738 54% => OK
Readability: 35.1254874158 45.7405998639 77% => OK
Elegance: 0.96835443038 1.45489161554 67% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159142826819 0.300154397459 53% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.105584545223 0.103427244359 102% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0735479931205 0.0752933317313 98% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.420995061459 0.497263757937 85% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.131617642489 0.151897553556 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0541490793979 0.114077575197 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0616566740815 0.0781384742642 79% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.321245527497 0.336927656856 95% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0907499386543 0.067059652881 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128002543744 0.210909579961 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0594484281566 0.0618886996521 96% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 11.8870967742 151% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.86379928315 129% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.91756272401 61% => OK
Positive topic words: 17.0 8.42114695341 202% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 2.4623655914 122% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.75985663082 72% => OK
Total topic words: 22.0 13.6433691756 161% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.