always telling the truth s the most important consideration in any relationship between people.
Throughout history, the issue of whether (or not) telling the truth in communication with nation has received a great deal of attention from different societies. Although some may argue that being honest in all condition is not indispensable, many others believe that the most significant principle in a relationship is verity. I am of the opinion that both of the mentioned viewpoints have their own merits and drawbacks, and following explanations will further elaborate on this perspective.
First and foremost, without a shadow of doubt, honesty is an ethical behavior. This means that the more one concealing the reality, the fewer acceptances will be achieved by societies. It is believed that the fundamental basis in any relationship is trustworthy which is not being received but only by honesty. As a result, expressing the truth make a tenacious bond in a relationship. In addition, lying is a consecutive manner and the liar need to represent the further untruth to disguise the previous one. For the purpose of illustration, I had a friend who had bought a car and had lied about the price. For covering the truth he forced to lie about the version of his car and its features.
Furthermore, it is established beyond doubt that lie or white lie might be a solution. In some situations such as cheating, not telling the truth might rescue the relationship or a person. Take a patient as an example, if a doctor states that the patient would not be longer alive the spirit of the patient could be destroyed. As a case in point, I have an aunt who had cancer. She was strong and had spirituality for being alive and fighting the disease. But when her doctor pointed out that the cancer has been developed and she has not any chance, she lost his strength and 1 month later she died.
In brief, contemplating all the aforementioned reasons, one can draw the conclusion that speaking truthy to people is an essential axiom. Nonetheless, it should be stressed that this argument is not define the lying as a solution. Finally, it is worth bearing in mind that this is a controversial issue which needs to be further discussed so as to provide conclusive results unanimously accepted by all societies. Therefore, I suggest that more surveys and studies be conducted on human behavior to enable us to answer this question more precisely.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | Charles William | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-14 | Md Lutfor Rahman | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-12 | mucahit11 | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | S M Naimul Mamun | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-06 | mirelly.meireles | 60 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 34, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
Throughout history, the issue of whether or not telling the truth in communication with...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...urther elaborate on this perspective. First and foremost, without a shadow of ...
^^^
Line 3, column 588, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'lain'.
Suggestion: lain
...d a friend who had bought a car and had lied about the price. For covering the truth...
^^^^
Line 7, column 200, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'defined'.
Suggestion: defined
...d be stressed that this argument is not define the lying as a solution. Finally, it i...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 341, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...sue which needs to be further discussed so as to provide conclusive results unanimously ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, if, may, nonetheless, so, therefore, as to, in addition, in brief, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 52.1666666667 75% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1954.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 399.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89724310777 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46933824581 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9668766016 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548872180451 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 599.4 618.680645161 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.537163646 48.9658058833 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.7 100.406767564 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.95 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.05 5.45110844103 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.103317643422 0.236089414692 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.033765495416 0.076458572812 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.053564990192 0.0737576698707 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0642578162284 0.150856017488 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0393678896944 0.0645574589148 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 86.8835125448 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.