Be different from everyone else and success
To commence, one of the compelling reasons that justifies the thesis is that through our history, successful people were different from the rest of the society. Being diverse from society’s norm was their unique ability and character that made them an eminent person. Galileo’s life is a prominent example of this case. At his time, the scientific society believed that our planet is flat, but by performing numerous experiments and mathematic calculations he proved that all the rest of people were wrong and his idea, which was an iconoclast one, is true.
Secondly, success is the direct result of breaking our limitations in any spectrum of life such as engineering or economical. Becoming aware of our limitations, which are peculiar for each person, should be our prim goal as without knowing them it would be unfeasible for us to break them. Usually, our limitations are hidden in new areas that we haven’t tried them yet. So, it seems impossible for us to determine our limitations without trying new things. For instance, Lionel Messi was a swimmer in his school team. By chance, he met a football coach that encouraged him to try a new and totally different sport, football. At that time, he realized that his poor running performance is the main problem that hinders his success. By practicing and allotting a great deal of time to track and field, he managed to overcome his weakness and now he turns out to be very successful football player. His current prosperous situation is the direct outcome of his efforts to know his limitations and shattering them.
- technology is bad or good 70
- Integrated essay for TOEFLReadingThe sea otter is a small mammal that lives in waters along the western coast of North America from California to Alaska. When some sea otter populations off the Alaskan coast started rapidly declining a few years ago, it c 86
- Should scientific and non-scientific activities at universities receive equal fund? 73
- Why Do You Think People Attend College Or University 70
- technology 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, second, secondly, so, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 52.1666666667 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1324.0 1977.66487455 67% => OK
No of words: 265.0 407.700716846 65% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99622641509 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.48103885553 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84896913523 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 212.727598566 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.607547169811 0.524837075471 116% => OK
syllable_count: 403.2 618.680645161 65% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.8000024758 48.9658058833 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.846153846 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3846153846 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.45110844103 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 4.53405017921 44% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143020876737 0.236089414692 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0506161323186 0.076458572812 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0565807980546 0.0737576698707 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11866814714 0.150856017488 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.016953956887 0.0645574589148 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 86.8835125448 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.