building home in the countryside
Nowadays, with the population booming, there is not enough space for people to live the big city. This trend prompts a controversial topic whether the government should permit people and companies to build the house in the countryside or not. I adamantly believe that there are many advantages in constructing a home in these regions.
Governments cannot turn a blind eye to need of those who are struggling to find an affordable place to live. The growth of population and limitation of space for building houses spark a detrimental issue which is soaring the price of each square matter of home. Accordingly, people living under poverty line cannot balance their monthly income with cost of living which one prominent part of it is the money they should pay for the renting a home monthly. If governments ignore this issue, the likelihood of spreading homelessness is a lot. On the other hand, by increasing the number of the house in the countryside, not only government and private sectors provide a place for people to live, but also since the supply of the home increase, the price of the home in the city will be decreased.
Traffic jam is one of the biggest problems in any metropolitan cities. in this case, if people travel to the countryside and the city's population declines, the less car would be available in the city. As a result, fewer people would be stuck in the traffic jam and less Carbon dioxide would be emitted to the environment. Some people might be believed that countryside reconstruction will decrease the green space and it will deteriorate the health of citizens. However, I think it is not necessarily the point because reducing the CO2 emissions by cars can lead the cities to better and healthier environment.
In a nutshell, I believe that governments should allow home construction companies to build homes for people. it would increase the quality of living for people who are in the predicament to find a proper place for themselves and their family, moreover, it will not only decrease the traffic jam in the city but also is a solution for air pollution.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: Young people today are less dependent on their parents than young people in the past 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: All university students should take basic science courses regardless of their fields of study. 76
- Twenty years ago, Dr. Field, a noted anthropologist, visited the island of Tertia. Using an observation-centered approach to studying Tertian culture, he concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village rather than 16
- Do you agree or disagree? It is better to travel abroad to visit different countries when you are younger rather than when you are older. 3
- tpo6 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 796, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the home in the city will be decreased. Traffic jam is one of the biggest proble...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 72, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...st problems in any metropolitan cities. in this case, if people travel to the coun...
^^
Line 4, column 110, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...on companies to build homes for people. it would increase the quality of living fo...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, however, if, moreover, so, i think, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 43.0788530466 46% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1741.0 1977.66487455 88% => OK
No of words: 358.0 407.700716846 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86312849162 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34981470047 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80757384527 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.508379888268 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 549.9 618.680645161 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.8700941455 48.9658058833 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.066666667 100.406767564 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8666666667 20.6045352989 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.45110844103 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225683759505 0.236089414692 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0768710121354 0.076458572812 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.091557993074 0.0737576698707 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144723437092 0.150856017488 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0528437018497 0.0645574589148 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 11.7677419355 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 86.8835125448 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.