Children over the age of 15 should be allowed to vote.
Children are the building block of any society or country. They are future of the country. So it behooves on parent and teacher to guide children in such a way that they should be able to give a new direction to the society. Chidlren should focus only on their studies and extra curricular activities which helps in buiding their future. Participating in the election is too early for them.
As we all know Even one vote matters in the election and choosing a right candidate requires lot of logical thinking and efforts which children lacks. They usually do not take interest in the matters of politics. They are busy in their own world. So the task of choosing a right candidate may be daunting for them and they end up in choosing the random candidate which can affect the election results drastically.
Nowadays social media plays a vital role in the results of election. Supporters of the candidate leverages social media in order to promote their leaders. Children might get influenced by these social media post and may choose the wrong candidate. For example Facebook played a vital role in determining the result of 2016 election. They used Data Analytics to change the mindset of the public and young voters get trapped in their net and it results in choosing the wrong president.
Moreover at this early age they have not developed keen sense to determine whether the policy of a candidate is right or wrong. They are not mature enough to contemplate the political rheoteric of a political leader. As a result they can interprate the comments of the candidate in a wrong way and it may lead to wrong choice which affect the entire country or state.
In conclusion, Children above 15 should not be given voting rights beacause they are not mature enough to choose the right candidate .
- Universities should require students to take courses only within those fields they are interested in studying. 50
- SuperCorp recently moved its headquarters to Corporateville. The recent surge in the number of homeowners in Corporateville proves that Corporateville is a superior place to live than Middlesburg, the home of SuperCorp's current headquarters. Moreover, Mi 50
- The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company. "According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced movies than in an 26
- The following appeared in a memorandum written by the vice president of Nature's Way, a chain of stores selling health food and other health-related products."Previous experience has shown that our stores are most profitable in areas where residents are h 82
- The best leaders are those who encourage feedback from the people whom they lead. 43
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 59, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...dia plays a vital role in the results of election. Supporters of the candidate le...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...lts in choosing the wrong president. Moreover at this early age they have not develop...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 75, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ve not developed keen sense to determine whether the policy of a candidate is rig...
^^
Line 7, column 281, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a wrong way" with adverb for "wrong"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...nterprate the comments of the candidate in a wrong way and it may lead to wrong choice which a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 133, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ure enough to choose the right candidate .
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
may, moreover, so, for example, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 43.0788530466 56% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 52.1666666667 79% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1502.0 1977.66487455 76% => OK
No of words: 311.0 407.700716846 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82958199357 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5378463383 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 212.727598566 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.514469453376 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 468.9 618.680645161 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.823704071 48.9658058833 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.4444444444 100.406767564 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2777777778 20.6045352989 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.22222222222 5.45110844103 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145756844971 0.236089414692 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0434971663018 0.076458572812 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0698899295569 0.0737576698707 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104840265268 0.150856017488 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0944624769491 0.0645574589148 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 11.7677419355 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 86.8835125448 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.