A city wants to help teachers of its high school students (age14-18) improve their teaching.It is considering two plans:
1) Choose a small group of excellent teachers;these teachers will attend a class led by an expert for additional training in how to teach effectively,and they will then come back to their schools and provide that training for other teachers in school.
2) Provide additional training in teaching effectively for high school teachers,using online material that each teacher will study individually.
Nowadays, technological advances have changed the approach of teaching. Distance-learning programs have gain in popularity such as the use of videos and online material. I believe the first plan is more effective for following reasons.
First of all, teachers studying individually online offers a more practical and convenient way of improving teaching ability. These online courses are available 24 hours a day, and therefore suitable for teachers who are busy, as long as they have Internet access. On top of this, when they have problems in comprehending some key concepts from the videos, they can click the pause button and replay the video until they fully digest information.
Additionally, teachers using materials online prevents experienced teachers from hiding essential methods or missing key points. If teachers use the wrong way to lecture, students would be unable to acquire new knowledge well even be weary of studying. By comparison, in online courses, all teachers can get access to the same content of the expert’s training. They can read identical and relevant materials, such as textbooks and expert’s note, and attend video lessons, which are recorded lectures of a distinguished expert.
Granted, a group of experienced teachers can better understand the teaching method and help other teachers to master the method. This is because teachers who watch videos are impossible to communicate with the expert face to face. When they have questions, the can only send an email but not get the guidance immediately. Conversely, those excellent teachers could absolutely interact with lectures even improve methods of the expert.
In conclusion, it is better to choose the first plan in consideration of efficiency and convenience. Online courses of experts are more accessible and enable teachers to receive equitable training.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important to havefacilities rather than hire more teachers 60
- Which of the following summer arrangements is better for a 16 17 year old student of grade eleven 1 Get ready for some of the major courses they want to study in College 2 Led by the teacher to visit museums or historical sites and then write paper 85
- A city wants to help teachers of its high school students (age14-18) improve their teaching.It is considering two plans:1) Choose a small group of excellent teachers;these teachers will attend a class led by an expert for additional training in how to tea 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 271, Rule ID: SEND_AN_EMAIL[1]
Message: Consider using 'email'.
Suggestion: email
... When they have questions, the can only send an email but not get the guidance immediately. C...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es even improve methods of the expert. In conclusion, it is better to choose th...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, first, if, so, therefore, well, in conclusion, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 43.0788530466 28% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 52.1666666667 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1584.0 1977.66487455 80% => OK
No of words: 287.0 407.700716846 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51916376307 4.8611393121 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.48103885553 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00244126856 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 212.727598566 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.602787456446 0.524837075471 115% => OK
syllable_count: 489.6 618.680645161 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.2039292767 48.9658058833 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.0 100.406767564 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9375 20.6045352989 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.3125 5.45110844103 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167323694504 0.236089414692 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0582909465918 0.076458572812 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0372601013182 0.0737576698707 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0921788195523 0.150856017488 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0462134921816 0.0645574589148 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 11.7677419355 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.44 10.9000537634 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.01818996416 118% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 86.8835125448 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.