A company is going to give some money either to support arts or to protect the environment. Which do you think the company should choose?
By and large, it is established beyond doubt that preserve arts and environment are of utmost critical important issue in every given society. Some people believe that a company should allocate a vast sum of money to expand arts enormously whereas others take an opposite perspective and allege that protect the environment should be the first priority. Due to the controversial nature of this question, there is not a general agreement on this question. I am, however, to a great extent of the conviction that although arts could be the symbol of culture and civilization, protect environment could bring crowds of advantages like the healthy lifestyle, healthy crops and so forth. In the following paragraphs, some convincing reasons will be delineated to elaborate my personal stance.
To commence with, art and environment both play a dominant role in every nation all around the world and the government or the companies should make an effort and bend over backward to preserve arts and environment. Generally phrased, vast majorities of people around the world especially in metropolitan cities suffer from pollution and unhealthy lifestyle. For example, traffic jam and big companies release toxic materials to the atmosphere, which help different disease such heart disease, branchiate and so on, spread out drastically. This situation could put people's health into danger and make them sick all the time. But allocate a substantial amount of money to the environment not only can diminish pollution but also can provide fertile ground for individuals to lead a healthy life. To elucidate more on this issue, although arts or artists represent the costume and ancestral legacy beyond the border of every country, preserve environment could provide an opportunity for people or society to push forward day in day out.
Another reason that should not go unnoticed is that protect environment could spread out agricultural field and farmlands in the different realm. To put it in another word, research in agriculture will produce new generations of crops that consume less water, produce more nourishment, and resist disease or fewer pesticides. Going into the depth, this protection of environment and agriculture will patronize economic situation or in some case may recover a country from recession and control inflation. However, protect arts is the symbol of culture in every country and it can introduce and transmit different costume and traditions to other nations. As the matter fact, this protection will result in a close relation between humans all around the globe and provide an opportunity for people in order to get acquaintance with different nationality.
In light of reasons elaborated, I reiterate that arts and environment play a key role in people's life and both help them to enhance their living condition. Indeed, protect the environment will give a chance to citizens to lead a healthy lifestyle without any disease. In addition, preserve environment could act as a bridge to expand agricultural purpose with new generations of crops.
- Compare the advantages and disadvantages of establishing a new university in your community 72
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In order to solve the problems in the present and future it is necessary to understand the past 78
- The following appeared in a letter to the editor of a local newspaper. "Commuters complain that increased rush-hour traffic on Blue Highway between the suburbs and the city center has doubled their commuting time. The favored proposal of the motorists' lo 60
- "Five years ago, at a time when we had difficulty obtaining reliable supplies of high-quality wool fabric, we discontinued production of our popular alpaca overcoat. Now that we have a new fabric supplier, we should resume production. Given the outcry fro 73
- TPO 32 81
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, so, whereas, for example, in addition, by and large, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 9.8082437276 194% => OK
Conjunction : 31.0 13.8261648746 224% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 43.0788530466 53% => OK
Preposition: 71.0 52.1666666667 136% => OK
Nominalization: 32.0 8.0752688172 396% => Less nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2590.0 1977.66487455 131% => OK
No of words: 487.0 407.700716846 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.318275154 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69766713281 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89592810194 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 252.0 212.727598566 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517453798768 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 819.9 618.680645161 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 44.0258045712 48.9658058833 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.315789474 100.406767564 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6315789474 20.6045352989 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.57894736842 5.45110844103 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173707328861 0.236089414692 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0520499697425 0.076458572812 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0573304876061 0.0737576698707 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104863880274 0.150856017488 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0366134466406 0.0645574589148 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 11.7677419355 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 58.1214874552 65% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.1575268817 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 10.9000537634 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 86.8835125448 137% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.