Compare and contrast your way of life with that of your parents. Which way of life do you think would be more satisfying to future generations?
Past generations, including my parents, have different lifestyle than my generations. The way we do things is different because of the technological advancement that has changed the way of people to communicate with other people, to travel to other places and to browse for information. I personally think that my current way of life is more attractive for future generations because of its simplicity factor.
Compared to my parents who would use newspapers or magazines to search information, I will use computers or mobile devices to access Internet instead. Internet browsing will provide faster results with abundant supply of information, which I can filter according to my preference. Future generations, who demand promptness, will likely use these products as well.
In term of communication, my parents depend mostly on postal service and public phone to contact their friends in other cities. Fortunately, the presence of technology like e-mail, instant messaging applications and online-call has eased the way I communicate. Technology has diminished the cost and distance constraint in the way people doing communication.
Nowadays, public transportation and private cars are more widely accessible with more affordable price. This phenomenon will help future generations to commute and travel more easily and quickly. For example, in the future, air transportation to neighbor countries will only take 1-hour with economical price.
In conclusion, current lifestyle that depends heavily on technology products will be more interesting for future generation because it will help them to eliminate many barriers, like distance, time and cost.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-19 | Punya | 60 | view |
| 2019-04-27 | adhgna@gmail.com | 60 | view |
| 2019-03-19 | Petros Tepoyan | 60 | view |
| 2019-02-09 | 30vil | 70 | view |
| 2018-09-03 | Dragut | 70 | view |
- The best teacher is one who is very knowledgeable about the subject matter Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 93
- Think critically about the following statement. A universal language should replace all languages. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of a universal language. 70
- The use of fluoride in preventative dentistry has been a great breakthrough in improving the dental health of large populations. Small amounts of soluble fluoride ions are present in all water sources, including oceans and also to some extent in food and 86
- Salmon a fish prized for both food and sport has a complex life cycle After spending several years in the ocean adult salmon travel back to the freshwater streams where they were originally spawned to lay their eggs the females bury the eggs under the san 78
- Technology is available to exploit the potential energy formed by tides for the generation of electrical energy. The basic structure is a barrage or dam built across a river estuary or at the mouth of a bay. This dam is similar to that used in hydroelectr 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 360, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... in the way people doing communication. Nowadays, public transportation and priv...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 311, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...only take 1-hour with economical price. In conclusion, current lifestyle that de...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, well, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 15.1003584229 26% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 43.0788530466 46% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 52.1666666667 63% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1420.0 1977.66487455 72% => OK
No of words: 249.0 407.700716846 61% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.70281124498 4.8611393121 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 4.48103885553 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16609043508 2.67179642975 119% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 212.727598566 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.606425702811 0.524837075471 116% => OK
syllable_count: 452.7 618.680645161 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.994623655914 101% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.2863703405 48.9658058833 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.230769231 100.406767564 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1538461538 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.07692307692 5.45110844103 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229144400205 0.236089414692 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0783826226554 0.076458572812 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0643323972557 0.0737576698707 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113248729364 0.150856017488 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0581840271515 0.0645574589148 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 11.7677419355 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 58.1214874552 61% => It means the essay is relatively harder to read.
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.1575268817 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.78 10.9000537634 145% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.84 8.01818996416 123% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 86.8835125448 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 10.002688172 125% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.