Compare and contrast your way of life with that of your parents. Which way of life do you think would be more satisfying to future generations?
I live in the era of technology, which makes my daily activities become easier and simpler. The presence of technology has brought many important impacts to human’s life from generations. Living in the era of my parents, therefore, might not be as easy as in current generation. Technological advancement has changed several aspects in our life including communication, traveling and information distribution. I personally think that future generations will not be able to live their life without technology products, thus they will choose my lifestyle.
Access to information is one of key challenges for people in past generations. There were only several tools or medias available to browse information, which were books, magazines or newspaper. Nowadays, my friends and I can easily access our computers or mobile devices to browse any kind of information from all over the world through Internet. This system is very helpful for future generations who are always eager for up-to-date information.
Communication, an interaction between two people or more to deliver a message or information, has always been a critical issue in our life. Previously, people use postal service or public phone to communicate with their relatives. This method, however, is quite expensive in term of cost and not practical. Fortunately, the combination of Internet and handheld communication devices has eased people way of communication. People in my generations can instantly send message to their partners using e-mail, SMS or even video call chat.
Last, traveling was considered expensive for people from my parents’ generations. This phenomenon was because transportation infrastructure was not well established. In current time, public transportation and private cars are more widely accessible with more affordable price than ever before. This will help future generations to commute and travel more easily and quickly.
In conclusion, current lifestyle that depends heavily on technology products will be more interesting for future generation because it will help them to eliminate many barriers, like distance, time and cost.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-08-19 | Punya | 60 | view |
2019-04-27 | adhgna@gmail.com | 60 | view |
2019-03-19 | Petros Tepoyan | 60 | view |
2019-02-09 | 30vil | 70 | view |
2018-09-03 | Dragut | 70 | view |
- Compare and contrast your way of life with that of your parents Which way of life do you think would be more satisfying to future generations 66
- Investigations made at laboratories in the various parts of the world indicate that apes are capable of understanding language and using linguistic responses at the level of young children. just because these animals do not have the physical apparatus for 80
- Think critically about the following statement. A universal language should replace all languages. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of a universal language. 70
- Asthma is ussually seen as a condition whose symptoms can be adequately controlled with the right medicines. Researchers point out that it is an intermittent disorder,characterized by temporary bouts of inflammation of the airways,which lead to typical sy 80
- The widespread use of the Internet has given people access to information on a level never experienced before. How does this increase in the availability of information influence life in today's world? 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, therefore, thus, well, in conclusion, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 43.0788530466 56% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.0752688172 235% => Less nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1821.0 1977.66487455 92% => OK
No of words: 326.0 407.700716846 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.58588957055 4.8611393121 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23003221865 2.67179642975 121% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 212.727598566 92% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598159509202 0.524837075471 114% => OK
syllable_count: 590.4 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.1533720655 48.9658058833 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.8421052632 100.406767564 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1578947368 20.6045352989 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.52631578947 5.45110844103 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172592955502 0.236089414692 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0484592408863 0.076458572812 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0404455340875 0.0737576698707 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.088632819649 0.150856017488 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0384839497022 0.0645574589148 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 11.7677419355 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 58.1214874552 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 10.9000537634 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 86.8835125448 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.