Do you agree or disagree:
Compared to people who live in villages and farm areas, people who live in cities are more satisfied with their lives
With the advancement of infrastructure and an accelerated pace of globalization, more people choose to live in cities rather than in the countryside due to various reasons. This phenomena has arouse a heated debate whether this is a good sign indicating an enhanced quality of life. Some holds the position that urban citizens are more satisfied with their live than those who in farm areas. However, this essay argues that rural life is more comfortable for modern people considering both internal and external factors.
To begin with, internal factors, including mental and physical health, are worth highlighting in terms of the merits brought by living in the rural area. In other words, rural life is beneficial because it provides a relative slow-paced lifestyle and natural environment to live in. Firstly, urban life is much faster than that of rural area. Currently, people are experiencing a higher level of pressure from their work and life. According to the survey conducted by World Psychiatric Association, mental health issues have been one of primary causes of urban mortality. In contrast, living in farms tends to be problem-free since the burden of work and social life is much lighter and do not exhaust people mentally and physically. Secondly, the environment is more friendly more citizens to enjoy their live there. Modern cities earn notoriety because of air pollution and etc.. A vast number of cars have emitted many pollutants, such greenhouse gas (i.e. carbon dioxide) and oxides of nitrogen. These pollutants not only threats the well-being of human beings, but the survival of other species as well. Consequently, the health of urban citizens suffers. On the contrary, a pleasant ecological environment in villages and farms contributes to the satisfaction of rural citizens. Therefore, people living in rural area are more mentally and physically contented with their lives.
Furthermore, apart from internal reasons, external factors are crucial to be discussed. Some may rebut that people who live in cities can enjoy the benefits of infrastructure and technologies. But this point is not well-grounded since the globalization and high technologies have spread to every corner of the world. Rural areas now, unlike in the past, have a better access to modern comforts. For example, the Internet and fast distribution channel of goods have enabled people to purchase any product whenever and wherever they want, which substantially meets the basic needs of people and makes little difference in terms of modern facilities and daily necessities.
To sum up, people living in remote areas are now enjoy their life more because they have less pressure, better living environment and access to advanced technologies and facilities. For this reason, people may reconsider their decision on living area as a better living quality is provided by the rural areas.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In modern times grandparents cannot give their grandchildren useful advice because the world of today and the world of 50 years ago are too different Use specific reasons and examples to support your a 76
- Do you agree or disagree Compared to people who live in villages and farm areas people who live in cities are more satisfied with their lives 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement the advice from the grandparents is of no use to their grandchildren because the world has changed a lot over the past 50 years 94
- Do you agree or disagree Compared to people who live in villages and farm areas people who live in cities are more satisfied with their lives 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 174, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: These
...the countryside due to various reasons. This phenomena has arouse a heated debate wh...
^^^^
Line 1, column 189, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'have', 'haven'.
Suggestion: have; haven
... due to various reasons. This phenomena has arouse a heated debate whether this is ...
^^^
Line 1, column 193, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'aroused'.
Suggestion: aroused
... to various reasons. This phenomena has arouse a heated debate whether this is a good ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 873, Rule ID: AND_ETC[1]
Message: Use simply 'etc.'.
Suggestion: etc.
...earn notoriety because of air pollution and etc.. A vast number of cars have emitted man...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 880, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
...toriety because of air pollution and etc.. A vast number of cars have emitted many...
^^
Line 5, column 98, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'rebuts'.
Suggestion: rebuts
...s are crucial to be discussed. Some may rebut that people who live in cities can enjo...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 50, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'enjoyed'.
Suggestion: enjoyed
..., people living in remote areas are now enjoy their life more because they have less ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, apart from, for example, in contrast, in other words, on the contrary, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 13.8261648746 159% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 43.0788530466 49% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 52.1666666667 127% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2437.0 1977.66487455 123% => OK
No of words: 459.0 407.700716846 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30936819172 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62863751936 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85189262842 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 243.0 212.727598566 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529411764706 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 773.1 618.680645161 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.4342426329 48.9658058833 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.541666667 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.125 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 5.45110844103 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.399851595832 0.236089414692 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111786221026 0.076458572812 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113030193076 0.0737576698707 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.262605659153 0.150856017488 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0654440477238 0.0645574589148 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 11.7677419355 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 58.1214874552 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 10.9000537634 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.01818996416 115% => OK
difficult_words: 134.0 86.8835125448 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.