do you agree or disagree? the environment issues are too complex to be handled by individuals.
The question is whether environmental issue can be managed by individual or not. Everyone with regard to his perspective may maintain a specific direction toward this statement. Some believe that environmental matters are too complex to be solved by individuals and the government should assist people in this way while others have a conviction that ordinary people are the best choice to support environmental issues. I am unanimous with the first group, so the next paragraphs will vastly elucidate my vantage point through three salient reasons:
To begin with, one should not forget that money plays a crucial role in improving environment. There are plentiful of tasks which must be done in related to natural ambient such as one program associated with cleaning river or ocean waters, rescuing threatened animals and reducing deforestation and list goes on; hence, removing all of these troubles requires the huge investment. The governments have to invite some famous companies, well-known organization and prominent institutions and so on, to invest their budget in this route. As a result, instead of the private schedules and long-term, the state can achieve the mentioned goal quickly and with a logical cost with the aforementioned approach.
The second reason for my argument lies the fact that ordinary people have not been trained to how to behave in front of environment's problems; hence, they may create more damages. For instance, take an example the assistance migration project which is a useful plan for transferring threatened animal species to the safe areas. Since some species are related to each other in one place and they cannot survive without the help of each other; therefore, people must know such the species which are in a network and then whole of network have to be transferred. Yet, recognizing such the complex networks require the collaboration among expert people like zoologists, anthropologists and environment engineers and etc.
Moreover, the existence of several special organizations is indispensable for advertising and notifying to ordinary people to protect the environment. The main task of these types of organizations is that they have to produce some brochures or provide some worthwhile advertising for giving needed information to individuals. As a matter a fact, as the old saying goes" a hand is not enough for breaking a hard wood", so these institutions can call people to participate in environment rescue movements and teach some conservation methods to them.
To sum up, this conclusion could be drawn that environment issues require elaborate programs and it can be said that such the detailed schedules can be gained through enormous investments, cooperating expert scientists and some special organizations which motivate people for collective movements.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 709, Rule ID: AND_ETC[1]
Message: Use simply 'etc.'.
Suggestion: etc.
...thropologists and environment engineers and etc. Moreover, the existence of several s...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, if, may, moreover, second, so, then, therefore, well, while, for instance, such as, as a result, to begin with, to sum up, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 43.0788530466 56% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.0752688172 260% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2402.0 1977.66487455 121% => OK
No of words: 442.0 407.700716846 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43438914027 4.8611393121 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58517132086 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05585346716 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 258.0 212.727598566 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58371040724 0.524837075471 111% => OK
syllable_count: 749.7 618.680645161 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.1344086022 144% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.8964147823 48.9658058833 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 160.133333333 100.406767564 159% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.4666666667 20.6045352989 143% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0666666667 5.45110844103 185% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.112126088904 0.236089414692 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0379269432913 0.076458572812 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0435634120295 0.0737576698707 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0677791855871 0.150856017488 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0417440085652 0.0645574589148 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.9 11.7677419355 161% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.58 58.1214874552 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.1575268817 156% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.81 10.9000537634 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.65 8.01818996416 120% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 86.8835125448 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.002688172 150% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.0537634409 135% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.