Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Since the beginning of civilization, humans' relationships have been considered as an essential factor in their lives. Nowadays, there is a controversial debate that is it better to keep old friendships or having the ability to make new friends. I personally contend that the ability to make new friends is far important rather than keep friendships with a small number of people. I will elaborate on my viewpoint in the following paragraphs.
First of all, the most important facet in this regard is geographic and time limitation. To be frank, these days, immigration and going abroad are very popular among individuals by the purpose of education, work, or relaxing. In this regard, some of us may lose our friends physically and have no access to see or even talk to them regularly as a matter of time or geographic constraints. As a case in point, I had four close friends that they immigrated to other countries one after another and I became lonely. I began to make new relationships to cover my lack of friends and soon I found a bunch of friends around me. If I had not had the ability to make new friends easily, I would have been lonely and sad these days. Hence, in our today's hectic life is far vital to have the ability to build relations readily.
Secondly, another important issue is the changing of situations. To be frank, lots of our relations occur around our needs such as emotional, work-related, and other fields. Besides, it is well-established that our situations vary over our life stage by stage. To be more detailed, imagine your life from your birth until now. You have experienced lots of situations and each situation you have some specific individuals around yourself. For instance, before school, you had friends in your neighborhood for playing together, in school you had some close friends to hang out and study in groups that you perhaps left them behind when you entered to the university or your job. I mean you lost that potent strings with them and replaced new people in your life. Thus, you should have the ability to make new friends to provide yourself appropriate friends in different conditions and situation and perhaps having an old friend from school cannot help you cope with your work-related problems.
To make a long story short, all the aforementioned reasons lead us to the conclusion that the ability to make new friends is a pivotal aspect of our life and it is prior to maintaining old small communities. I highly recommend everyone to improve their social skills to make new and effective relationships.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-06-03 | sonyeoso | 80 | view |
2023-04-10 | KimiaKermanshahian | 76 | view |
2023-03-15 | MichelleGAOOO | 70 | view |
2022-12-14 | HSNDEK | 73 | view |
2022-11-24 | AT2G38040 | 70 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily. Use specific reasons and 76
- tpo 49 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In the past, young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them; today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives.Use specific reasons and examples to 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 355, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: a few; some
...rtant rather than keep friendships with a small number of people. I will elaborate on my viewpoin...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 174, Rule ID: IT_IS_JJ_TO_VBG[1]
Message: Did you mean 'maintain'?
Suggestion: maintain
...l aspect of our life and it is prior to maintaining old small communities. I highly recomme...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, hence, if, may, second, secondly, so, thus, well, for instance, i mean, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 59.0 43.0788530466 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 67.0 52.1666666667 128% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2129.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 439.0 407.700716846 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84965831435 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57737117129 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84590029868 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 212.727598566 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51708428246 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 661.5 618.680645161 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.2591831051 48.9658058833 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.380952381 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9047619048 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.19047619048 5.45110844103 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30013102975 0.236089414692 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0837495977872 0.076458572812 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0830301498939 0.0737576698707 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188561043983 0.150856017488 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0421553690356 0.0645574589148 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 11.7677419355 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 86.8835125448 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.