Do you agree or disagree with following statement? All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is.
Throughout the history, human beings have perpetually been exposed to several instructive experiences which have far-reaching impact on their future. In this regard, the controversial question that has always caused heated debates is whether history course should be obligatory for university students or not. Some people possess the conviction that students had better concentrate on their own field and try to be master in it rather than read unrelated subjects like history. I, nevertheless, hold an alternative notion and subscribe to the idea that history should be mandatory in university for a couple of reasons. Further discussion on this topic can be boiled down to a couple of upcoming reasons below.
The first exquisite reason which bears in mind is that it is indispensable that each country learn from their past in order to preclude erroneous decision in future. Delving into historical events not only broaden our perspective about past phenomena but also act as a light to go through future. Accordingly, each student which likely become one of the country's authorities in future, are expected to be aware of the country’s history to use those experiences. To shed light in this issue, Iran have always allocated a lot of energy and investment in educating students; that’s why it always has the most literate and elite people in the world. As a statistic research conducted in university of British Colombia demonstrated that accomplishments of Iranian scientists have undeniable and profound effect in prosperity of today's advanced world. Contemplating this result convince them to put more energy and budget toward boosting their pedagogical approaches to bring about more adept and thrived scientists.
The other worthwhile reason which vindicate my viewpoint is that countries had better know their friends and enemies. And nothing can be more efficient than learning from historical events. As a matter of fact, in order to establish international political as well as economical mutual relationships, each country shouldn't underestimate the past relation with those countries. Furthermore, they should take into account that whether that country have been committed to their promises or not. Consequently, it is more plausible to impede similar mistakes. As a convincing example, Iran has always trust its neighbors in commerce. Some of this bilateral trade was fruitful and occasionally there were some countries which did not abide by the agreement. However, Iranian governors maintain commercial relations with those countries which violate the agreements, and each time they face several predicament. Had Iran learned from its history, it would be more cautious in international relations today.
All in all, the aforementioned reasons lead us to conclusion that it is crucial for each student to know about the past events and take advantage of lucrative experience to inhibit making mistakes. So it is highly recommended that history be a compulsory course not only for university student but for high school’s students as well. Imagine country which its people don’t have any information about their history; how governor can convince them about their inclination or disinclination in their behavior and bilateral relations with other countries?
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Telephone has greater influence on people s lives than television has 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Because modern life is very complex it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The opinions of celebrities such as famous entertainers and athletes are more important to younger people than they are to older people 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Parents do not understand their children as well as parents did 50 years ago 90
- You have long been friends with someone If they do something that you don t like should you still be friends with him or her 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 156, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...in order to preclude erroneous decision in future. Delving into historical events not onl...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 375, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
... become one of the countrys authorities in future, are expected to be aware of the countr...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 314, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
...ical mutual relationships, each country shouldnt underestimate the past relation with th...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 596, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'trusted'.
Suggestion: trusted
...s a convincing example, Iran has always trust its neighbors in commerce. Some of this...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 884, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun predicament seems to be countable; consider using: 'several predicaments'.
Suggestion: several predicaments
...the agreements, and each time they face several predicament. Had Iran learned from its history, it ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, however, nevertheless, so, well, while, as a matter of fact, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.0286738351 172% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 72.0 52.1666666667 138% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2782.0 1977.66487455 141% => OK
No of words: 508.0 407.700716846 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47637795276 4.8611393121 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.74751043592 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00006974933 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 276.0 212.727598566 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543307086614 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 868.5 618.680645161 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.6445722961 48.9658058833 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.956521739 100.406767564 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0869565217 20.6045352989 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.60869565217 5.45110844103 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191947195389 0.236089414692 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0543504506851 0.076458572812 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0508146939293 0.0737576698707 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131328850034 0.150856017488 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0635609774955 0.0645574589148 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 11.7677419355 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 58.1214874552 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.1575268817 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 10.9000537634 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.01818996416 119% => OK
difficult_words: 154.0 86.8835125448 177% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.