Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Because the world is changing so quickly, people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
According to my point of view, it depends on each persons' aspect and view, whether he is now less satisfied with his life than he was in the past, but still i think people now are more happy and satisfied with their lives than people were in the past. I hold this opinion because of several reasons. First, by technology development, todays' lives are more facilitated and modernized than lives in the past, so contemporary people have more convenient lives than past generations. Second, there are so many available progressive methods, which enable people to have more chance and opportunities for living happily, while, people in past generations were not able to reach various opportunities to enhance their skills and abilities to obtain more convenient lives.
I believe that in such a fast-paced modernized world, people usually can obviate their needs and difficulties more easily than past. In other words, by introducing new methods and technologies, so many facilities and equipment are provided now for people to meet their needs. For instance, internet, which was a remarkable revolution in contemporary living methods, helps people to resolve their emergency problems easier and faster than past, since people in the past, had not such a great chance to exploit the internet benefits. Besides, more developed transformation vehicles such as subway, airplane, and fast-moving trains influenced on contemporary people's lives, which help them to transport and commute to another place easier and faster.
Moreover, there are manifold progressive methods, which enable people to have more chance and opportunities for living happily. To illustrate, people in the past could not make high degree education, because there were not many unlimited chances to go to university. Additionally, people in the past time were induced to begin their job when they were still young, therefore, they were not able to improve their skills and talents. While, people now are able to go to universities and enhance their educational career in order to enhance their quality of lives.
Generally, I absolutely agree with that people now are more happy and satisfied with their lives than people were in the past.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-17 | Umme Abiha | 75 | view |
| 2023-05-17 | Umme Abiha | 70 | view |
| 2023-04-19 | Umme Abiha | 60 | view |
| 2023-04-01 | Hossein2000 | 90 | view |
| 2022-12-24 | farjam | 60 | view |
- TPO 30 independent writing task 42
- TPO 36 integrated writing skill 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 77
- TPO 35 integrated writing skill 70
- TPO 41 integrated writing skill
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 51, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...to my point of view, it depends on each persons aspect and view, whether he is now less...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 158, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...life than he was in the past, but still i think people now are more happy and sat...
^
Line 3, column 295, Rule ID: PAST_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'pastime'?
Suggestion: pastime
...university. Additionally, people in the past time were induced to begin their job when th...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, if, moreover, second, so, still, therefore, while, for instance, i think, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1855.0 1977.66487455 94% => OK
No of words: 353.0 407.700716846 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25495750708 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79011373424 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 212.727598566 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.487252124646 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 592.2 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.1344086022 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 63.69221479 48.9658058833 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.692307692 100.406767564 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1538461538 20.6045352989 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.07692307692 5.45110844103 167% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.370969057829 0.236089414692 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.155225636872 0.076458572812 203% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116237368362 0.0737576698707 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.29316599107 0.150856017488 194% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.115291267601 0.0645574589148 179% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 11.7677419355 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 58.1214874552 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.1575268817 148% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 10.9000537634 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 86.8835125448 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.0537634409 127% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.