Is it prudent to say that increasing cost of fuel will help in reducing air pollution ...? There are two different schools of thought. One school answers in the affirmative whereas, the other school disagrees. According to my point of view I disagree with statement saying that pollution will be decreased. This can be illustrated by using two different points firstly air pollution is not caused by only fuels and other one is how to reduce use of extra fuel so that it can reduce air pollution caused by same.
Air pollution can be caused by burning plastics as well as wildfires, volcano, factories based on coal and petroleum oil as fuel. First two options are way more harmful that last option. We can not control air pollution caused by natural disasters like wildfire and volcanoes . Some wildfires in history had wiped whole forests. But we can control other means of air pollution caused by man made activities for instance unnecessary use of vehicles. exploitation of natural resources from forests and mines.
Increasing the price of fuel might reduce the use of fuels but it has more drawbacks than benefits. We can not stop production of important things of daily life so it will result in increase the cost of products and this might lead to inflation. Common people can not bear these extra expense and this might also lead to fall of government. n India whenever incidences of fuel cost was increased by government at that time people went on strike to show their opposition. For any government its found to be shameful that people are not happy with them.
So other strategies like car pooling, strict vehicle pollution control rules, forestation in dormitory of factories, factory polluted air should be released after proper treatments. Another option is to discover alternatives to fuel that is biofuel. Plants like 'Jatrofa' and ethanol from bacteria are found to be useful up to lab scale. This has to be taken to field scale. All above thoughts differ in their line of reasoning and other strategies are cogent and relabel that increasing fuel prices.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is important to know about events happening around the world, even if it is unlikely that they will affect your daily life.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Some people believe that the Earth is being harmed by human activity Others feel that human activity makes the Earth a better place to live What is your opinion 83
- TP0 40 - Integrated 3
- Do you prefer to preparing for big test with a classmate or alone? 70
- sales 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 253, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...llution caused by natural disasters like wildfire and volcanoes . Some wildfires ...
^^
Line 3, column 277, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...l disasters like wildfire and volcanoes . Some wildfires in history had wiped who...
^^
Line 3, column 451, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Exploitation
...r instance unnecessary use of vehicles. exploitation of natural resources from forests and m...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 342, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: N
... might also lead to fall of government. n India whenever incidences of fuel cost ...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, so, well, whereas, as to, for instance, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.0752688172 223% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1734.0 1977.66487455 88% => OK
No of words: 350.0 407.700716846 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95428571429 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62688711192 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.554285714286 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 532.8 618.680645161 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.6530590546 48.9658058833 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.5714285714 100.406767564 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6666666667 20.6045352989 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.85714285714 5.45110844103 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24486822739 0.236089414692 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0688991023571 0.076458572812 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.068062709758 0.0737576698707 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14546309252 0.150856017488 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0607076803804 0.0645574589148 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 11.7677419355 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.13 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 86.8835125448 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.