Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
The best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
In this sophisticated world travel play an important role in human life. Many people prefer travelling solely without any organized tour while some people like to join a group for travelling. Pesonally, I prefer to travel in a group led by a tour guide. To support this idea I provide three main reasons which I will explore in this article.
First of all, I prefer to have pleasure of the nature or the cities which I travel rather than wasting time on routine daily works like preparing food or reserving accomodations. In the case of travelling within a group many routined work are referred to the group and they have responsiblity to provide trip facillities. For instance, last year I attend in a trip on my own and I that was not a good expericene since I had to spend my time finding hotel, campossing directions and providing food. Finally, I missed a lot of visiting sites and due to limitation in time I had to finish my journey without visiting a monumental place.
My second reason addresses this idea that a trip should prepare humane to make better social interactions rather than merely visiting historical and natural locations. Many social interactions could be shaped if we join a group in pursuit of a trip. Based on my own experience, I could make friends in recent travels and one of them known as my best and closest friend. This possibility, the expansion of social interaction I mean, is not prepared in state of travelling alone.
Last but not least, tour leaders encounter their fellowships with uniqe data and unpredictable experiences that make the travel worthwhile. For example they may show a natural location in the nature or they may offer their group a special delicious food. I believe this may be owing to assimilate new travellers and this is justified by the competetive logic between different tour leaders. My friends reported about their unique experience in visiting Romania i visitig natural locations in forest only guided by their leader.
To sum up beased on all reasons and arguments mentioned above, I prefer travelling within a group. This route of travel provides not only more time to visit places, but it also hels us to expand our social interactions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-23 | Pakshid | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-20 | 2507575150 | 60 | view |
| 2019-12-12 | JohnSmith96 | 70 | view |
| 2019-12-12 | JohnSmith96 | 70 | view |
| 2019-12-07 | Chara | 60 | view |
- TPO 25 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Some people say that the Internet provides people with a lot of valuable information. Others think access to much information creates problems. Which view do you agree with?Use specific reasons and ex 81
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? At universities and colleges, sports and social activities are just as important as classes and libraries and should receive equal financial support. Use specific reasons and examples to support your 73
- TPO 14 Integrated 60
- TPO 16 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 516, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ns and providing food. Finally, I missed a lot of visiting sites and due to limit...
^^
Line 13, column 230, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[5]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'special delicious food'.
Suggestion: special delicious food
...he nature or they may offer their group a special delicious food. I believe this may be owing to assimil...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, may, second, so, while, for example, for instance, i mean, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 15.1003584229 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1848.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 378.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88888888889 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40933352052 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80234038172 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55291005291 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 594.0 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.6890040787 48.9658058833 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.666666667 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.27777777778 5.45110844103 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153499523798 0.236089414692 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0583651914691 0.076458572812 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.061265355453 0.0737576698707 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0914716798095 0.150856017488 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0460972905242 0.0645574589148 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 11.7677419355 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 86.8835125448 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.