Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide.
At every turn of each individual life, no one can turn a blind eye to the signifiant effects of travel experience. Some people argue that the best way to travel is in a group led by a tourist guide. On the other extreme of the rope, others hold the opposite opinion. Although both sides take their own positions, personally speaking, I firmly believe that the first group carries more weight. In the following paragraph, I will explain my reason to justify my points of view.
As the first and paramount reason, having a tour guide in a group of travel people can expand their horizons and discover different places. In other words, a tourism guide can provide for tourists valuable experience and also shows the local culture. For example, when I traveled to Mexico with a group led by a local guide, I could understand their habits and ceremonies. As a result, I developed my knowledges of Mexican culture. If I had not had a local guide in my trip, nor could I understand Mexican concepts and ideas neither I could discover distinct points of tourism.
The second reason coming to my mind to substantiate my viewpoint is that, a tour guide can relive people stress and worries in a group trip. To be more specific, a guide will provide for a tourism group all the support necessary, such as transport. Hence, people will have a good experience and feelings in a trip. A experimental research conducted by a resort's company shows that people who have a tour guide enjoyed more the city and the hotel's services. Therefore, I think a guide provides for people good experiences.
In conclusion, take the above reasons into account, I strongly believe that the best form to travel in a group is with a tour guide, because it not only opens up a gamut of local and trip advantages, but also helps people to have mistakes in a trip.
- Summarise the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they case doubt on specific points made in the reading passage Communal online encyclopedias represent one of the latest resources to be found on the Internet They are in many respects lik 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours 66
- Summarise the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they case doubt on specific points made in the reading passage As early as the twelfth century A D the settlements of Chaco Canyon in New Mexico in the American Southwest were notable for 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Playing computer games is a waste of time Children should not be allowed to play them 81
- Question Summarise the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they case doubt on specific points made in the reading passage A recent study reveals that people especially young people are reading far less literature novels plays and poems th 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 316, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'An' instead of 'A' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: An
...good experience and feelings in a trip. A experimental research conducted by a re...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, second, so, therefore, for example, i think, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 15.1003584229 26% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 52.1666666667 73% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1513.0 1977.66487455 77% => OK
No of words: 325.0 407.700716846 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.65538461538 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62923752081 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 212.727598566 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.507692307692 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 618.680645161 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.8732969711 48.9658058833 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.5625 100.406767564 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3125 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.8125 5.45110844103 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227615585334 0.236089414692 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0753047461839 0.076458572812 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0720397538318 0.0737576698707 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140326429166 0.150856017488 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0146293649205 0.0645574589148 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 11.7677419355 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 10.9000537634 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 86.8835125448 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.